Leibniz on the trinity and the incarnation: Reason and revelation in the seventeenth century (review)
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (1):pp. 145-146 (2009)
In this exhaustively researched and thoughtful study of Leibniz’s neglected theological writings, Maria Rosa Antognazza presents a strong case that Leibniz held original and highly developed views on the relation between faith and reason, the theology of the Trinity, and the nature of Christ. Furthermore, she argues convincingly that Leibniz’s views were consistently maintained throughout his life and “coexist comfortably” with his distinctive metaphysics; “perhaps,” she suggests in the introduction, Leibniz’s metaphysics and theology are even “reinforcing one another” . In fact, her book proves this suggestion correct, revealing the importance of Leibniz’s theology to the understanding of his metaphysics.The book is structured into four parts: “Early Writings 1663–1671”; “Fragments of a System 1672–1692”; “English Trinitarian Polemics 1693–1705”; and “The Last Years 1706–1716.” Leibniz argues for three major theological positions. On the relation of faith and reason, he contends that the authority of scripture and theological tradition give the Christian mysteries a presumption of truth. The proper role of reason in theological matters is to distinguish authentic revelations from false
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robin Le Poidevin (2009). Incarnation: Metaphysical Issues. Philosophy Compass 4 (4):703-714.
Michael C. Rea (2003). Relative Identity and the Doctrine of the Trinity. Philosophia Christi 5 (2):431 - 445.
J. Westerhoff (2006). Review: Philosophical Languages in the Seventeenth Century: Dalgarno, Wilkins, Leibniz. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (458):444-447.
Richard Viladesau (1990). The Trinity in Universal Revelation. Philosophy and Theology 4 (4):317-334.
Thomas D. Senor (1999). The Incarnation and the Trinity. In Michael J. Murray (ed.), Reason for the Hope Within. Wm. B. Eerdmans
Maria Rosa Antognazza (2001). Leibniz de Deo Trino: Philosophical Aspects of Leibniz's Conception of the Trinity. Religious Studies 37 (1):1-13.
Maria Rosa Antognazza (2001). The Defence of the Mysteries of the Trinity and the Incarnation: An Example of Leibniz's 'Other' Reason. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2):283 – 309.
Dale Tuggy (2009). Maria Rosa Antognazza Leibniz on the Trinity and the Incarnation: Reason and Revelation in the Seventeenth Century . Trans. Gerald Parks. (New Haven Ct & London: Yale University Press, 2007). Pp. XXV+322. £35.00 (Hbk). Isbn 978 0 300 10074. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 45 (2):232-237.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #115,873 of 1,934,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,405 of 1,934,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?