David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 8 (12):955 - 962 (1989)
Ebejer and Morden (Paternalism in the Marketplace: Should a Salesman Be His Buyer's Keeper?, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 1988) propose limited paternalism as a sufficient regulative condition for a professional ethic of sales. Although the principle is immediately appealing, its application can lead to a counter-productive ethical quandary I call the Pontius Pilate Plight. This quandary is the assumption that ethical agents' hands are clean in certain situations even if they have done something they condemn as immoral. Since limited paternalism can give rise to this queer conclusion in the salesperson/buyer relationship, the principle is suspect. It may be a necessary condition for ethical sales, but is not sufficient. This discussion concludes by suggesting two additional criteria which, when complemented by the limited paternalism principle, are jointly sufficient.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul Whysall (1995). Ethics in Retailing. Business Ethics: A European Review 4 (3):150-156.
Paul Whysall (1995). Ethics in Retailing. Business Ethics 4 (3):150–156.
John D. Pratten (2005). The Attitude of a Town's Pub Licensees to Their Responsibilities. Business Ethics 14 (3):250–260.
John D. Pratten (2005). The Attitude of a Town's Pub Licensees to Their Responsibilities. Business Ethics: A European Review 14 (3):250-260.
Similar books and articles
Franklin G. Miller & Alan Wertheimer (2007). Facing Up to Paternalism in Research Ethics. Hastings Center Report 37 (3):24-34.
Thomas Nys, Yvonne Denier & T. Vandevelde (eds.) (2007). Autonomy & Paternalism: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Health Care. Peeters.
George Brockway (1993). Limited Paternalism and the Salesperson: A Reconsideration. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):275 - 279.
Jonathan Schonsheck (1991). Deconstructing Community Self-Paternalism. Law and Philosophy 10 (1):29 - 49.
Bjørn Hofmann (2003). Technological Paternalism: On How Medicine has Reformed Ethics and How Technology Can Refine Moral Theory. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):343-352.
Huw Price (2006). Blackburn and the War on Error. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):603 – 614.
Marion Smiley (1989). Paternalism and Democracy. Journal of Value Inquiry 23 (4):299-318.
Dan W. Brock (1985). Review Essay/a Case for Limited Paternalism. Criminal Justice Ethics 4 (2):79-88.
James M. Ebejer & Michael J. Morden (1988). Paternalism in the Marketplace: Should a Salesman Be His Buyer's Keeper? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (5):337 - 339.
Roshan D. Ahuja, Mary Walker & Raghu Tadepalli (2001). Paternalism, Limited Paternalism and the Pontius Pilate Plight When Researching Children. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (1):81 - 92.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #264,594 of 1,911,741 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,113 of 1,911,741 )
How can I increase my downloads?