David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 61 (3):407-28 (1994)
This paper examines the nomic covariationist strategy of using idealization to define representation. While the literature has focused upon the possibility of defining ideal conditions for perception, I argue that nomic covariationist appeals to idealization are pseudoscientific and contrary to a foundational and empirically well-supported methodological presupposition in cognitive science. Moreover, one major figure in this camp fails to come to grips with its role and its problems in mainstream science. Thus he forwards a false dichotomy of the sciences and treats idealization as a blank check written by scientists on an unknown bank. Finally, I consider and reject alternative formulations of the nomic covariationist's idealization strategy
|Keywords||Cognition Covariation Physics Representation Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Toni Vogel Carey (2012). Always or Never: Two Approaches to Ceteris Paribus. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 77 (3):317-333.
Similar books and articles
Gabriel Vacariu, Dalia Terhesiu & Mihai Vacariu (2001). Toward a Very Idea of Representation. Synthese 129 (2):275-295.
Arthur B. Markman & Eric Dietrich, Something Old, Something New: Extending the Classical View of Representation.
Arthur B. Markman & Eric Dietrich (2000). Extending the Classical View of Representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (12):470-475.
Charles Wallis (1995). Asymmetric Dependence, Representation, and Cognitive Science. Southern Journal of Philosophy 33 (3):373-401.
Rebecca Kukla (1992). Cognitive Models and Representation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (2):219-32.
Steven F. Geisz (2009). Turning Representation Inside Out: An Adverbial Approach to the Metaphysics of Language and Mind. Philosophical Forum 40 (4):437-471.
Alexander Riegler (ed.) (1999). Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences: Does Representation Need Reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
William S. Robinson (1999). Representation and Cognitive Explanation. In Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences: Does Representation Need Reality, Riegler. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Hengwei Li & Huaxin Huang (2007). Representation and Development of Cognition. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):583-600.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #98,934 of 1,102,818 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,475 of 1,102,818 )
How can I increase my downloads?