|Abstract||This Article argues that the communications regime orchestrated by the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct is intentionally designed to create a one-way street, systematically channeling information in the attorney-client relationship in lawyers' direction while often leaving clients in the dark. Furthermore, the asymmetric distribution of information in the attorney-client relationship is not in clients' best interests but rather grounded in lawyers' self-interest and in a paternalistic approach that fails to take communications, and therefore clients, seriously. Finally, taking communications, and thus clients, seriously requires adopting a new communications regime that would mandate disclosure of all material information to clients. The Article proposes a materiality-based communications regime and explores its application in several contexts.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Jurrit Bergsma & Bertha Mook (1998). Ethical Considerations in Psychotherapeutic Systems. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (4):371-381.
Mark Yarborough, Joan A. Scott & Linda K. Dixon (1989). The Role of Beneficence in Clinical Genetics: Non-Directive Counseling Reconsidered. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (2).
Ellen B. Braaten & Michael M. Handelsman (1997). Client Preferences for Informed Consent Information. Ethics and Behavior 7 (4):311 – 328.
Suzanne le Mire (2011). Testing Times: In-House Counsel and Independence. Legal Ethics 14 (1):21-47.
Beverly E. Thorn, Nancy J. Rubin, Angela J. Holderby & R. Clayton Shealy (1996). Client-Therapist Intimacy: Responses of Psychotherapy Clients to a Consumer-Oriented Brochure. Ethics and Behavior 6 (1):17 – 28.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,130 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,438 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?