David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Ethics 8 (1):5-35 (2004)
“Terrorism”' is sometimes defined as a “form ofcoercion.” But there are important differences between ordinary coercion and terrorist intimidation. This paper explores some of those differences, particularly the relation between coercion, on the one hand, and terror and terrorization, on the other hand. The paper argues that while terrorism is not necessarily associated with terror in the literal sense, it does often seek to instill a mental state like terror in the populations that it targets. However, the point of instilling this mental state is not necessarily coercive or intimidatory: one can try to instill terror as an act of punishment, or as an expressive or therapeutic act, or because one values the political consequences that might follow, or because one thinks terror is preferable, from an ethical point of view, to the inauthentic complacency that characterizes the targeted population at present. Though this paper asks questions about the definition of “terrorism,” these questions are not asked for their own sake. The quest for a canonical definition of “terrorism” is probably a waste of time. But asking questions which sound like questions of definition is sometimes a fruitful way of focusing our reflections on terrorism and organizing our response.
|Keywords||Hannah Arendt coercion definition fear Thomas Hobbes intimidation liberty means/end distinction rational choice state terror terrorism terrorize threat|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Fritz Allhoff (2009). The War on Terror and the Ethics of Exceptionalism. Journal of Military Ethics 8 (4):265-288.
Clive Barnett (2009). Violence and Publicity: Constructions of Political Responsibility After 9/11. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (3):353-375.
Verena Erlenbusch (2013). How (Not) to Study Terrorism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (4):1-22.
Tamar Meisels (2009). Defining Terrorism – a Typology. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (3):331-351.
David Lay Williams (2009). Hobbes and Terrorism. Critical Review 21 (1):91-108.
Similar books and articles
Bashshar Haydar (2005). The Ethics of Fighting Terror and the Priority of Citizens. Journal of Military Ethics 4 (1):52-59.
Shawn Kaplan (2008). A Typology of Terrorism. Review Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (1):1-38.
Jay Sloan-Lynch (2011). Domestic Abuse as Terrorism. Hypatia 27 (3):774 - 790.
Anne Schwenkenbecher (2010). Terrorism Against Non-Innocents: The Ethical Implications. In Paul Omoyefa (ed.), Basic Applied Ethics. VDM.
Charles Tilly (2004). Terror, Terrorism, Terrorists. Sociological Theory 22 (1):5-13.
Paul Gilbert (2009). Messy Morality: The Challenge of Politics – by C. A. J. Coady the Trouble with Terror: Liberty, Security and the Response to Terrorism – by Tamar Meisels Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: Ethics and Liberal Democracy – by Seumas Miller. [REVIEW] Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):418-420.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads87 ( #14,206 of 1,101,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #19,662 of 1,101,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?