David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (4):747-779 (2010)
I locate possible fertile common ground among the “new natural law theory” of Finnis, Grisez, and Boyle, the “traditional” Thomism of McInerny, and natural law derivationism. I respond to Murphy’s contention that the “inclinationism” of Finnis cannot be successfully asserted along with what Murphy takes to be a basic requirement of natural law ethics, namely that basic practical principles are to be “strongly grounded” in human nature. I argue that the tension between the inclinationism of Finnis and Murphy’s basic requirement is not irresolvable. In response to objections by Murphy to natural law derivationism, I argue, basedin part on Searle’s attempt to derive an “ought” from an “is,” that the new natural law theorists and McInerny can and should investigate natural law derivationismfor possible adoption
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mark C. Murphy (2006). Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Jonathan Crowe (2011). Natural Law Beyond Finnis. Jurisprudence 2 (2):293-308.
Edmund Wall (2008). Natural Law and Basic Goods. Philo 11 (1):50-77.
Owen J. Anderson (2012). The Natural Moral Law: The Good After Modernity. Cambridge University Press.
C. Fred Alford (2010). Narrative, Nature, and the Natural Law: From Aquinas to International Human Rights. Palgrave Macmillan.
John Finnis (1980). Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Crowe (2005). Existentialism and Natural Law. Adelaide Law Review 26:55-72.
Bernard G. Prusak (2008). What Kant Reconstructed Brings to Aquinas Reconstructed; Or, Why and How the New Natural Law Needs to Be Extended. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:99-113.
Craig Paterson (2006). Aquinas, Finnis and Non-Naturalism. In Craig Paterson & Matthew Pugh (eds.), Analytical Thomism: Traditions in Dialogue. Ashgate
Timothy A. O. Endicott (2001). How to Speak the Truth. American Journal of Jurisprudence 46 (1):229-248.
John Finnis (2011). Religion and Public Reasons. Oxford University Press.
John Finnis (2011). Reason in Action. Oxford University Press.
Ellen Frankel, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2000). Natural Law and Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads20 ( #187,675 of 1,907,057 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #277,075 of 1,907,057 )
How can I increase my downloads?