David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Zygon 44 (4):757-776 (2009)
The various aesthetic phenomena found repeatedly in the scientific enterprise stem from the role of God as artist. If the Creator is an artist, how and why natural scientists study the divine art work can be understood using theological aesthetics and the philosophy of art. The aesthetic phenomena considered here are as follows. First, science reveals beauty and the sublime in natural phenomena. Second, science discovers beauty and the sublime in the theories that are developed to explain natural phenomena. Third, the search for beauty often guides scientists in their work. Fourth, where beauty is perceived, feelings of the sublime often also follow upon further contemplation. This linkage of beauty in science with truth and the sublime runs counter to most aesthetic theory since Kant. Scholarship in theological aesthetics has recently argued that the modern and postmodern elevation of the sublime over beauty is merely a preference that reveals a bias against transcendence—against God. If doing and understanding science can show this sundering of the sublime from the beautiful to be in error, science also gives evidence of transcendence.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Monroe C. Beardsley (1975). Aesthetics From Classical Greece to the Present: A Short History. University of Alabama Press.
Monroe C. Beardsley (1975). Aesthetics From Classical Greece to the Present: A Short History. University Alabama Press.
John R. Betz (2005). Beyond the Sublime: The Aesthetics of the Analogy of Being (Part One). Modern Theology 21 (3):367-411.
Richard Dawkins (1998). Unweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion, and the Appetite for Wonder. Houghton Mifflin.
Gideon Engler (1990). Aesthetics in Science and in Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 30 (1):24-34.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
C. E. Emmer (2007). The Flower and the Breaking Wheel: Burkean Beauty and Political Kitsch. International Journal of the Arts in Society 2 (1):153-164.
Galen A. Johnson (2009). The Retrieval of the Beautiful: Thinking Through Merleau-Ponty's Aesthetics. Northwestern University Press.
Timothy M. Costelloe (ed.) (2012). The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge University Press.
Alexander Rueger (2007). Kant and the Aesthetics of Nature. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):138-155.
Edmund Burke (2008). A Philosophical Enquiry Into the Sublime and Beautiful. Routledge Classics.
C. E. Emmer (2001). The Senses of the Sublime: Possibilities for a Non-Ocular Sublime in Kant's Critique of Judgment. In Volker Gerhardt, Rolf Horstmann & Ralph Schumacher (eds.), Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 3. Walter de Gruyter.
Edmund Burke (1759/1970). A Philosophical Enquiry Into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, 1759. Menston,Scolar P..
Immanuel Kant (1960). Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Edmund Burke (1759/2008). A Philosophical Enquiry Into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Dover Publications.
Gabriele Tomasi (2005). Kant on Painting and the Representation of the Sublime. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):545-567.
Added to index2009-11-26
Total downloads130 ( #10,930 of 1,696,294 )
Recent downloads (6 months)29 ( #12,491 of 1,696,294 )
How can I increase my downloads?