David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
What happened to the doctrine of natural right in the nineteenth century? We know that it flourished in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. We know that something like it - the doctrine of human rights and new forms of social contract theory - flourished again in the second half of the twentieth century and continues to flourish in the twenty-first. In between there was a period of decline and hibernation - uneven, to be sure, and never complete - but a period in which to invoke natural right was always to invite intellectual ridicule and accusations of political irresponsibility. Thus article asks: How far can the decline of natural right in the nineteenth century be attributed to the reaction against the revolution in France? How far it was the effect of independent streams of thought, like positivism and historicism? Why was radical thought so ambivalent about natural right throughout the nineteenth century, and why was socialist thought in particular inclined to turn its back on i? As a framework for thought, natural right suffered a radical decline in the social and political sciences. But things were not so clear in jurisprudence, and natural right lived on to a much riper old age in the writings of some prominent economists. So we have to ask: What is it about this theory that allowed it to survive in these environments, when so much of the rest of intellectual endeavor in the nineteenth century was toxic or inhospitable to it. Finally, I shall ask how far American thought represents an exception to all of this. Why and to what extent did the doctrine survive as a way of thinking in the United States, long after it had lost its credibility elsewhere.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anthony J. Lisska (2007). On the Revival of Natural Law: Several Books From the Last Half-Decade. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (4):613-638.
Patti Tamara Lenard (2005). The Decline of Trust, The Decline of Democracy? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (3):363-378.
Anthony James Sebok (1998). Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence. Cambridge University Press.
Stuart D. Warner (1990). The Politics of the Book. Philosophy and Theology 4 (3):223-252.
Basil Willey (1940/1972). The Eighteenth-Century Background: Studies on the Idea of Nature in the Thought of the Period. Harmondsworth,Penguin.
Linda Kirk (1987). Richard Cumberland and Natural Law: Secularisation of Thought in Seventeenth-Century England. J. Clarke & Co..
T. J. Hochstrasser (2000). Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
Edward Grant (2007). A History of Natural Philosophy: From the Ancient World to the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-06-14
Total downloads97 ( #11,688 of 1,100,994 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #58,870 of 1,100,994 )
How can I increase my downloads?