The development of Lockean abstraction
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (3):395 – 418 (2000)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesM. W. Bunder (2000). Expedited Broda-Damas Bracket Abstraction. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (4):1850-1857.
Kit Fine (2002). The Limits of Abstraction. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Walmsley (1999). Locke on Abstraction: A Response to M. R. Ayers. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (1):123 – 134.
Rafal Urbaniak (2010). Neologicist Nominalism. Studia Logica 96 (2):149-173.
Christopher Gauker (1992). The Lockean Theory of Communication. Noûs 26 (3):303-324.
Christopher Gauker (1993). An Extraterrestrial Perspective on Conceptual Development. Mind and Language 8 (1):105-30.
Peter Vallentyne (2007). On Original Appropriation. In Malcolm Murray (ed.), Liberty, Games, and Contracts: Jan Narveson and the Defence of Libertarianism. Aldershot: Ashgate Press.
Michael Zuckert (2005). Natural Rights and Imperial Constitutionalism: The American Revolution and the Development of the American Amalgam. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):27-55.
Tibor R. Machan (2009). Self-Ownership and the Lockean Proviso. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):93-98.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,615 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
