The Fallacy of Many Questions: On the Notions of Complexity, Loadedness and Unfair Entrapment in Interrogative Theory [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Argumentation 13 (4):379-383 (1999)
The traditional fallacy of many questions, also known as the fallacy of complex question, illustrated by the question, "Have you stopped sexually harassing your students?", has been known since ancient times, but is still alive and well. What is of practical importance about this fallacy is that it represents a tactic of entrapment that is very common in everyday argumentation, as well as in special kinds of argumentation like that in a legal trial or a parliamentary debate. The tactic combines the use of loaded questions with the complexity of the question. A key notion is that of the presupposition of the question. How to deal with such questions is a point of departure for interrogative theory, and for any attempts to construct formal dialogues of a kind that can be used as normative models of argumentation
|Keywords||argument tactics debate fallacies interrogation loaded questions multiple-choice questions multiple questions questioning tricky questions|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wai-Hung Wong & Zanja Yudell (2013). How Fallacious is the Consequence Fallacy? Philosophical Studies 165 (1):221-227.
Christoph Lumer (2000). Reductionism in Fallacy Theory. Argumentation 14 (4):405-423.
James Somerville (2001). Time and Interrogative Logical Form. Philosophy 76 (1):55-75.
Louise Cummings (2004). Rejecting the Urge to Theorise in Fallacy Inquiry. Argumentation 18 (1):61-94.
Roy A. Sorensen (1996). Unbeggable Questions. Analysis 56 (1):51–55.
Douglas Walton (1999). Rethinking the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization. Argumentation 13 (2):161-182.
Douglas N. Walton (1994). Begging the Question as a Pragmatic Fallacy. Synthese 100 (1):95 - 131.
Louise Cummings (2002). Hilary Putnam's Dialectical Thinking: An Application to Fallacy Theory. [REVIEW] Argumentation 16 (2):197-229.
David Botting (2011). Can 'Big' Questions Be Begged? Argumentation 25 (1):23-36.
Cliff Ermatinger (2005). Common Nonsense: 25 Fallacies About Life (and Their Solutions). Circle Press.
Ben Kotzee (2010). Poisoning the Well and Epistemic Privilege. Argumentation 24 (3):265-281.
Ralph H. Johnson (1998). Douglas N. Walton, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy. Argumentation 12 (1):115-123.
William Goodwin (2010). The 'Passes-For' Fallacy and the Future of Critical Thinking. Argumentation 24 (3):363-374.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads14 ( #267,763 of 1,934,364 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #145,866 of 1,934,364 )
How can I increase my downloads?