David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):353-367 (2002)
This review provides a critical appraisal of two of the more significant contributions of the Minnesota approach to moral development. One contribution is the componential model which describes the four psychological components underlying moral behaviour. Evaluation of this model focuses on the adequacy of its synthesis of disparate processes in moral functioning, its instruments for assessing the four components, and its framework for moral education. A second contribution entails the conceptual and methodological reformulations known as the neo-Kohlbergian approach. Evaluation of this approach focuses on its emphasis on macro-morality, redefinition of post-conventional morality, proposal of three moral schemas and six moral types and assessment of moral judgement with the Defining Issues Test. This review identifies the most valuable contributions of the Minnesota approach, as well as its most telling limitations
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James R. Rest, Darcia Narvaez, Stephen J. Thoma & Muriel J. Bebeau (2000). A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach to Morality Research. Journal of Moral Education 29 (4):381-395.
Stephen J. Thoma (2002). An Overview of the Minnesota Approach to Research in Moral Development. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):225-245.
Terence H. McLaughlin & J. Mark Halstead (2000). John Wilson on Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 29 (3):247-268.
Clark Power (1988). The Just Community Approach to Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 17 (3):195-208.
Minkang Kim & Derek Sankey (2009). Towards a Dynamic Systems Approach to Moral Development and Moral Education: A Response to the JME Special Issue, September 2008. Journal of Moral Education 38 (3):283-298.
Sally I. Powers (1988). Moral Judgement Development Within the Family. Journal of Moral Education 17 (3):209-219.
Peter M. Nardi (1979). Moral Socialization: An Empirical Analysis of the Hogan Model. Journal of Moral Education 9 (1):10-16.
Peter E. Langford (1991). The Assessment of Moral Autonomy Within a Multidimensional Approach to the Development of Moral Reasoning. Journal of Moral Education 20 (1):55-78.
Terri Lee Robinett (2008). A Comparison of Moral Reasoning Stages Using a Model of Hierarchical Complexity. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):468 – 479.
Chris W. Surprenant (2010). Kant's Contribution to Moral Education: The Relevance of Catechistics. Journal of Moral Education 39 (2):165-174.
Jules Holroyd (2007). A Communicative Conception of Moral Appraisal. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (3):267 - 278.
Dennis L. Krebs, Kathy Denton & Gillian Wark (1997). The Forms and Functions of Real‐Life Moral Decision‐Making. Journal of Moral Education 26 (2):131-145.
Timothy J. Bayne (2002). Moral Status and the Treatment of Dissociative Identity Disorder. Journal Of Medicine And Philosophy 27 (1):87-105.
Jonathan Haidt & Fredrik Bjorklund (2008). Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions About Morality. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology Vol. 2. MIT Press.
Lawrence J. Walker & Thomas J. Moran (1991). Moral Reasoning in a Communist Chinese Society. Journal of Moral Education 20 (2):139-155.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads5 ( #176,067 of 1,008,715 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?