David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Management 6 (3):8 (2012)
In this paper, I build on Wittgenstein’s metaphor of a toolbox to introduce the metaphor of ‘tool confusion’ – how differing conceptual constructs may be applied, or misapplied, to one another and the effect that such applications have on the advancement of management theory. Moving beyond metaphor, I investigate a theory of management through two specific philosophical lenses (Popper and Lyotard). This analysis tests both the theory and the philosophies with regard to how each philosophy may be applied as a tool to advance theory towards more effective application. Preliminary conclusions confirm that the application of partial philosophies is not as useful as the application of complete philosophies. Deeper contemplation, however, suggests that there is no upper limit to the completeness of philosophies. Thus, the problem of completeness is inescapable. In place of completeness, I explore the use of perceptual tools that are more specific, foundational and concise. Engaging in a second investigation, I use structures of logic (circular, linear, branching and co-causal) to investigate the subject theory. This investigation suggests at least two important insights relating to the structure of theory and the fuzziness of theory. Combined, these investigations and related conversations suggest rigorous methods for advancing theories and a more normative role for the philosophy of management that will support the accelerated advancement of management theory and practice
|Keywords||metatheory theory of theory fuzziness tool confusion logics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Steven E. Wallis (ed.) (2010). The Structure of Theory and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions: What Constitutes an Advance in Theory? IGI Global.
Joseph Heath (2009). The Uses and Abuses of Agency Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (4):497-528.
Paddy Jane McShane (2014). Game Theory and Belief in God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (1):3-12.
Darryl Reed (1999). Stakeholder Management Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (3):453-483.
David W. Lutz (2009). African "Ubuntu" Philosophy and Global Management. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (3):313 - 328.
B. Verbeek (2002). Game Theory and Moral Norms. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):337-352.
Warren A. Shibles (1995). Emotion in Aesthetics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Simon L. Dolan (2006). Managing by Values: A Corporate Guide to Living, Being Alive and Making a Living in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan.
Amitai Etzioni (2000). Toward a Theory of Public Ritual. Sociological Theory 18 (1):44-59.
Alison Chorley & Trevor Bench-Capon (2005). An Empirical Investigation of Reasoning with Legal Cases Through Theory Construction and Application. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (3-4):323-371.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-10-22
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?