David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Law and Philosophy 31 (1):77-98 (2012)
Ulysses contracts are a method by which one person binds himself by agreeing to be bound by others. In medicine such contracts have primarily been discussed as ways of treating people with episodic mental illnesses, where the features of the illness are such that they now judge that they will refuse treatment at the time it is needed. Enforcing Ulysses contracts in these circumstances would require medical professionals to override the express refusal of the patient at the time treatment is required, something that is generally problematic both ethically and legally. In this paper I will argue that despite appearances Ulysses contracts can make it the case that treating a patient in such circumstances is an instance of treating him with his consent, although safeguards are needed to ensure that this is the case. Given the potential benefits to patients I further argue that modified Ulysses contracts should be made legally enforceable
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Phil Bielby (2012). Ulysses Arrangements in Psychiatric Treatment: Towards Proposals for Their Use Based on 'Sharing' Legal Capacity. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis (2):1-29.
Similar books and articles
Ryan Spellecy (2003). Reviving Ulysses Contracts. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):373-392.
John K. Davis (2008). How to Justify Enforcing a Ulysses Contract When Ulysses is Competent to Refuse. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (1):pp. 87-106.
Theo Van Willigenburg & Patrick J. J. Delaere (2005). Protecting Autonomy as Authenticity Using Ulysses Contracts. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):395 – 409.
Michael Lavin (1986). Ulysses Contracts. Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (1):89-101.
Michael Quante (1999). Precedent Autonomy and Personal Identity. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):365-381.
Chrisoula Andreou (2008). Making a Clean Break: Addiction and Ulysses Contracts. Bioethics 22 (1):25–31.
Ruben Berrios (2006). Government Contracts and Contractor Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 63 (2):119 - 130.
Y. M. Barilan (2012). Ulysses Contracts and the Nocebo Effect. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (3):37-39.
Philipp Bagus & David Howden (2012). The Continuing Continuum Problem of Deposits and Loans. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (3):295-300.
J. A. Davison (1956). The Ulysses Theme W. B. Stanford: The Ulysses Theme. Pp. X+292. Oxford: Blackwell, 1954. Cloth, 31s. 6d. Net. The Classical Review 6 (01):9-12.
Thomas W. Dunfee (1991). Business Ethics and Extant Social Contracts. Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1):23-51.
Alan Wertheimer (1992). Unconscionability and Contracts. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (4):479-496.
Deborah L. Kidder, William P. Smith & Barrie E. Litzky (2009). Lest We Forget. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:357-363.
Luca Anderlini & Leonardo Felli (1999). Incomplete Contracts and Complexity Costs. Theory and Decision 46 (1):23-50.
Kathryn MacKay (2009). An Examination of Exploitation in International Gestational Surrogacy Contracts. Dissertation, McGill University
Added to index2011-07-12
Total downloads22 ( #188,656 of 1,937,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,797 of 1,937,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?