David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 29 (3):279-284 (1962)
Much of the Mill-Whewell dispute was purely verbal, but much was not. Mill did not understand Whewell; the true character of the non-verbal aspect of the controversy emerges only upon adequate analysis of Whewell's actual position. Such analysis shows that Mill's objections to Whewell were misdirected, although suggestive of other which might, if prosecuted, carry. Ultimately, the dispute has to do with the given; neither man gives an adequate account of it. For this reason, the controversy cannot be resolved definitively in favor of either of them
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gerd Buchdahl (1971). Inductivist Versus Deductivist Approaches in the Philosophy of Science as Illustrated by Some Controversies Between Whewell and Mill. The Monist 55 (3):343-367.
Aaron D. Cobb (2011). History and Scientific Practice in the Construction of an Adequate Philosophy of Science: Revisiting a Whewell/Mill Debate. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):85-93.
John S. Wilkins (2013). Biological Essentialism and the Tidal Change of Natural Kinds. Science and Education 22 (2):221-240.
John Wettersten (1994). William Whewell: Problems of Induction Vs. Problems of Rationality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):716-742.
Laura J. Snyder (1997). Discoverers' Induction. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):580-604.
Laura J. Snyder (2006). Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society. University of Chicago Press.
Laura J. Snyder (2005). Confirmation for a Modest Realism. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):839-849.
Kent Johnson (2011). Quantitative Realizations of Philosophy of Science: William Whewell and Statistical Methods. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (3):399-409.
J. S. Mill (1987). Whewell on Moral Philosophy. In John Stuart Mill (ed.), Utilitarianism and Other Essays. Penguin Books
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #146,958 of 1,789,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #263,819 of 1,789,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?