David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Topoi 31 (1):93-100 (2012)
Anti-realistic conceptions of truth and falsity are usually epistemic or inferentialist. Truth is regarded as knowability, or provability, or warranted assertability, and the falsity of a statement or formula is identified with the truth of its negation. In this paper, a non-inferentialist but nevertheless anti-realistic conception of logical truth and falsity is developed. According to this conception, a formula (or a declarative sentence) A is logically true if and only if no matter what is told about what is told about the truth or falsity of atomic sentences, A always receives the top-element of a certain partial order on non-ontic semantic values as its value. The ordering in question is a told-true order. Analogously, a formula A is logically false just in case no matter what is told about what is told about the truth or falsity of atomic sentences, A always receives the top-element of a certain told-false order as its value. Here, truth and falsity are pari passu , and it is the treatment of truth and falsity as independent of each other that leads to an informational interpretation of these notions in terms of a certain kind of higher-level information
|Keywords||Anti-realism Logical truth Logical falsity Told values|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Ofer Arieli & Arnon Avron (1996). Reasoning with Logical Bilattices. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (1):25--63.
N. D. Belnap (1977). A Useful Four-Valued Logic. In J. M. Dunn & G. Epstein (eds.), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic. D. Reidel.
Nuel Belnap (1977). How a Computer Should Think. In G. Ryle (ed.), Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy. Oriel Press Ltd..
Didier Dubois (2008). On Ignorance and Contradiction Considered as Truth-Values. Logic Journal of the Igpl 16 (1):195--216.
J. Michael Dunn (1976). Intuitive Semantics for First-Degree Entailments and 'Coupled Trees'. Philosophical Studies 29 (3):149-168.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kevin Scharp (2010). Falsity. In Cory D. Wright & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (eds.), New Waves in Truth. Palgrave Macmillan.
Timothy Williamson (2000). Truth, Falsity, and Borderline Cases. Philosophical Topics 28 (1):211-244.
Yaroslav Shramko & Heinrich Wansing (2005). Some Useful 16-Valued Logics: How a Computer Network Should Think. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (2):121 - 153.
Scott Soames (2011). True At. [REVIEW] Analysis 71 (1):124 - 133.
Jan Woleński (2007). Two Critical Contributions to the Problem of Truth and Meaning. Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):137-141.
Gabriel Sandu (2000). Minimalism and the Definability of Truth. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:143-153.
Yaroslav Shramko (2005). Dual Intuitionistic Logic and a Variety of Negations: The Logic of Scientific Research. Studia Logica 80 (2-3):347 - 367.
Sergei P. Odintsov (2009). On Axiomatizing Shramko-Wansing's Logic. Studia Logica 91 (3):407 - 428.
J. C. Beall (ed.) (2007). Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Bradley H. Dowden (1984). Accepting Inconsistencies From the Paradoxes. Journal of Philosophical Logic 13 (2):125-30.
Andrea Iacona (2006). True in a Sense. Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):141-154.
John Peterson (2004). Truth and Exemplarism. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):69-77.
Francesco Berto & Graham Priest (2008). Dialetheism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008).
Added to index2012-01-05
Total downloads26 ( #56,466 of 1,088,370 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #30,800 of 1,088,370 )
How can I increase my downloads?