David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):699-700 (2000)
Violations and biases relative to normative principles of rationality tend to occur when the structure of task environments is novel or the decision goals are in conflict. The two blades of bounded rationality, the structure of task environments and the computational capacities of the actor, can sharpen the conceptual distinctions between the sources of the normative and descriptive gap.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Reiko Yakushijin & Robert A. Jacobs (2011). Are People Successful at Learning Sequences of Actions on a Perceptual Matching Task? Cognitive Science 35 (5):939-962.
Olga Voskuijl & Arne Evers (2007). Tensions Between the Prescriptive and Descriptive Ethics of Psychologists. Journal of Business Ethics 72 (3):279 - 291.
Sandra L. Schneider (2000). An Elitist Naturalistic Fallacy and the Automatic-Controlled Continuum. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):695-696.
Ryan D. Tweney & Michael E. Doherty (1983). Rationality and the Psychology of Inference. Synthese 57 (November):129-138.
Norbert Schwarz (2004). Errors of Judgment and the Logic of Conversation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):355-355.
Seth Bullock & Peter M. Todd (1999). Made to Measure: Ecological Rationality in Structured Environments. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 9 (4):497-541.
Sylvain Moutier & Olivier Houd (2003). Judgement Under Uncertainty and Conjunction Fallacy Inhibition Training. Thinking and Reasoning 9 (3):185 – 201.
Gary Gigliotti & Barry Sopher (1997). Violations of Present-Value Maximization in Income Choice. Theory and Decision 43 (1):45-69.
X. T. Wang (2000). From Simon 's Scissors for Rationality to Abc's Adaptive Toolbox. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):765-766.
Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West (2000). Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):645-665.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #348,658 of 1,101,095 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #177,118 of 1,101,095 )
How can I increase my downloads?