Journal of Business Ethics 73 (2):161 - 176 (2007)
|Abstract||Increasingly through the 1990s, tobacco control advocates questioned the practice of public institutions investing in tobacco company stocks. The questioning was framed in at least three ways. First, is it ethical to fund public expenditures with profits from a product that causes addiction and disease? Second, is it sound social policy to derive public income from a product that increases healthcare costs and reduces worker productivity? Finally, is it sound fiscal policy to invest in an historically profitable industry facing multiplying legal and regulatory challenges? While the tobacco industry preferred to restrict discussion to the fiscal question, and offered an affirmative answer, its position was weakened by depressed stock prices brought on by actions of the industry as much as by tobacco control activism. As part of a campaign to restore its credibility as an investment vehicle with public fund managers, Philip Morris (PM) commissioned a report from the influential investment managers/advisors Wilshire Associates. However, Wilshire had only recently conducted such a study for the Washington State Investment Board (WSIB), assuring the board that the value tobacco stocks added to an investment portfolio – if any – was too small to be measured. Nonetheless, within a year, Wilshire produced a report for PM which appeared to laud the investment value of tobacco and to dismiss tobacco-excluded investment alternatives. This paper examines how Wilshire produced apparently diametrically opposed reports for clients with different interests. It reveals a pattern of potential conflicts of interest among tobacco companies, financial analysis firms, investment authorities, and institutional fund managers. It demonstrates substantial violations of two generally accepted ethical principles of business consulting: veracity and transparency.|
|Keywords||divestment ethics consulting public health policy public investments tobacco industry documents|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
E. Breton & W. Sherlaw (2011). Examining Tobacco Control Strategies and Aims Through a Social Justice Lens: An Application of Sen's Capability Approach. Public Health Ethics 4 (2):149-159.
William R. Pasewark & Mark E. Riley (2010). It's a Matter of Principle: The Role of Personal Values in Investment Decisions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 93 (2):237 - 253.
Guido Palazzo & Ulf Richter (2005). CSR Business as Usual? The Case of the Tobacco Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 61 (4):387 - 401.
Mark S. Schwartz (2003). The "Ethics" of Ethical Investing. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):195 - 213.
Steven R. Thomsen (1998). Public Relations and the Tobacco Industry: Examining the Debate on Practictioner Ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (3):152 – 164.
A. Bitton & N. Eyal (2011). Too Poor To Treat? The Complex Ethics of Cost-Effective Tobacco Policy in the Developing World. Public Health Ethics 4 (2):109-120.
Patrizia Russo, Candida Nastrucci, Giulio Alzetta & Clara Szalai (2011). Tobacco Habit: Historical, Cultural, Neurobiological, and Genetic Features of People's Relationship with an Addictive Drug. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 54 (4):557-577.
Michelle Inness, Julian Barling, Keith Rogers & Nick Turner (2008). De-Marketing Tobacco Through Price Changes and Consumer Attempts Quit Smoking. Journal of Business Ethics 77 (4):405 - 416.
David A. Bella (1997). Organized Complexity in Human Affairs: The Tobacco Industry. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (10):977-999.
Derek Yach (2001). Healthy Investments in Investing in Health. Journal of Business Ethics 33 (3):191 - 198.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #245,680 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?