Piety and Individuality Through a Convoluted Path of Rightness: Exploring the Confucian Art of Moral Discretion via Analects 13.18
Asian Philosophy 21 (4):395 - 418 (2011)
|Abstract||This essay presents an in-depth interpretation of the controversial dialogue in Analects 13.18 through careful and critical investigation of its historical background and philosophical significations. With a clarification of the multifaceted connotations of the word zhi (?, upright, forthright), my study brings out the play of irony in Confucius's words in Analects 13.18. According to my interpretation, not only is Confucius's reaction not inappropriate but it also demonstrates the art of early Confucian moral discretion that was informed by the teaching of quan (? moral discretion). Accordingly, Confucius's judgment of the case embodied a high and bright middle way of moral choice originating in the openness and sincerity of heart. It epitomized a singular moment of deliberation and decision that was responsible for a sinuous opening of piety and individuality within the interplay of conflicting conditions and requisitions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jiyuan Yu (2012). Transmitting and Innovating in Confucius:Analects7:1. Asian Philosophy 22 (4):375-386.
Stephen A. Wilson (1995). Conformity, Individuality, and the Nature of Virtue: A Classical Confucian Contribution to Contemporary Ethical Reflection. Journal of Religious Ethics 23 (2):263 - 289.
Henry Rosemont Jr (2012). A Reader's Companion to the Confucian Analects. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wen Haiming (2011). Two Versions of Desire-Based Subjectivism: A Comparative Study of the Analects and the Lotus Sutra. Asian Philosophy 21 (4):419 - 435.
Hagop Sarkissian (2010). Confucius and the Effortless Life of Virtue. History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (1):1-16.
Peter R. Woods & David A. Lamond (2011). What Would Confucius Do? – Confucian Ethics and Self-Regulation in Management. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (4):669-683.
Thomas W. Selover (2005). Hsieh Liang-Tso and the Analects of Confucius: Humane Learning as a Religious Quest. OUP USA.
Kirill O. Thompson (2011). Sounding the Analects , Engaging Confucius. Philosophy East and West 61 (1):195-215.
Karyn L. Lai (2006). Li in the "Analects": Training in Moral Comptence and the Question of Flexibility. Philosophy East and West 56 (1):69 - 83.
Karyn L. Lai (2012). Knowing to Act in the Moment: Examples From Confucius'Analects. Asian Philosophy 22 (4):347-364.
Shuo Dongfang & Hongcheng Lin (2006). Separation of Politics and Morality: A Commentary on Analects of Confucius. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):401-417.
Hans-Georg Moeller (2004). New Confucianism and the Semantics of Individuality. A Luhmannian Analysis. Asian Philosophy 14 (1):25 – 39.
Qingping Liu (2003). Filiality Versus Sociality and Individuality: On Confucianism as "Consanguinitism". Philosophy East and West 53 (2):234-250.
Added to index2011-12-15
Total downloads7 ( #142,326 of 722,874 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,874 )
How can I increase my downloads?