David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (1):1-12 (2009)
To grasp the truth in traditional Chinese classics, we need to uncover the long obscured xiang è±¡ (image) thinking, which has long been overshadowed by Occidentalism. xiang thinking is the most fundamental thought of human beings. The logic of linguistics all comes from xiang thinking . Through conceptual thinking, people can understand Western classics on metaphysics, yet they may not completely understand the various schools of Chinese classics. The difference between Chinese and Western ways of thinking originated in the difference of the basic views developed in the Axial period . Since Aristotle, Western metaphysical ideas have all been manifested in substantiality, objectivity, and being ready-made, whereas Chinese Taiji, Dao, Xin-xing, and Zen were manifested in the non-substantiality, non-objectivity, and non-ready-made-ness of a dynamic whole. To grasp substance, rational and logical thinking such as definition, judgment, and reasoning is necessary. On the other hand, to grasp Taiji, Dao, etc., which is a dynamic whole or non-substances, xiang thinking , which is related to perception and rich in poetic association, is essential. History has taught us a lesson, i.e., when we opened the window to logical thought, we closed that of xiang thinking . We should remember the words of Xu Guangqi, i.e., To mingle harmoniously and understand thoroughly so as to excel
|Keywords||xiang xiang thinking non-substantiality rationality perception 象 象思维 实体性 非实体性 理性 悟性|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Xiaogan Liu & Laozi (1997). Laozi. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
Jana S. Rošker (2015). Classical Chinese Logic. Philosophy Compass 10 (5):301-309.
Similar books and articles
Zhang Xiang (2008). From Sino—African Relations Comes a Steady Stream of Enlightening Guidance. Contemporary Chinese Thought 40 (1):11-28.
Gang Zhang (2011). Form and Formless: A Discussion with the Authors of Anticipating China. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (4):585-608.
Robert E. Allinson (ed.) (1989). Understanding the Chinese Mind: The Philosophical Roots. Oxford University Press.
Huan Xiang (1980). The Problems of China's Socialist Modernization. Contemporary Chinese Thought 11 (4):60-81.
Wu Kuang-ming (2010). “Let Chinese Thinking Be Chinese, Not Western”: Sine Qua Non to Globalization. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (2):193-209.
Xiang Shiling (2011). Creation of the Concept of Benti and Theory of Ontology in Chinese Philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought 43 (1):30-42.
J. Scot Brackenridge, Guo Xiang. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Wang Shuren & Zhang Lin (2009). The Roots of Chinese Philosophy and Culture — An Introduction to "Xiang" and "Xiang Thinking". Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (1):1 - 12.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #176,896 of 1,789,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #423,018 of 1,789,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?