David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (1):57-82 (2012)
The purpose of this study is to analyse the effects of personal demographic factors on Chinese university students’ values and perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) issues, and to identify the link between personal values and perceptions of CSR. The quantitative data consisted of 980 Chinese university students, and were collected by using a structured self-completion questionnaire. This study found that: 1) the importance of values education should be stressed, because we found that altruistic values associate negatively with perception of CSR, in contrast, egoistic values associate positively; 2) a CSR education programme should be designed accordingly to fit different student characteristics and needs such as gender and major differences; 3) values should be used as criteria for education and recruitment purposes, e.g., we found that female students represent more ethical values than male students, and have a more negative perception of the CSR performance; 4) the importance of environment performance should be recognised by Chinese corporations and policy-makers, because we found that Chinese corporations perform better in economic and social responsibilities than environmental responsibility. It provides an insight of the value structures of Chinese university students and the forces that shape ethical perceptions. It offers a comprehensive study of Chinese companies’ CSR performance, and the results improve the awareness of scholars and managers in solving the current problems and developing their CSR performances further
|Keywords||CSR China Perception Education Values|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Maria Lai-Ling Lam (2007). A Study of the Transfer of Corporate Social Responsibility From Well-Established Foreign Multinational Enterprises to Chinese Subsidiaries. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:343-363.
Fernanda Duarte (2010). Working with Corporate Social Responsibility in Brazilian Companies: The Role of Managers' Values in the Maintenance of CSR Cultures. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (3):355 - 368.
Lei Wang & Heikki Juslin (2009). The Impact of Chinese Culture on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Harmony Approach. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (3):433 - 451.
Liangrong Zu & Lina Song (2009). Determinants of Managerial Values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence From China. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):105 - 117.
Christine A. Hemingway & Patrick W. Maclagan (2004). Managers' Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1):33-44.
Ann Lawrence & Peter Lawrence (2009). Values Congruence and Organisational Commitment: P—O Fit in Higher Education Institutions. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (4):297-314.
George Lan, Zhenzhong Ma, JianAn Cao & He Zhang (2009). A Comparison of Personal Values of Chinese Accounting Practitioners and Students. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):59 - 76.
Soo-Yeon Kim & Hyojung Park (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility as an Organizational Attractiveness for Prospective Public Relations Practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (4):639-653.
Yungwook Kim & Soo-Yeon Kim (2010). The Influence of Cultural Values on Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of Hofstede's Dimensions to Korean Public Relations Practitioners. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 91 (4):485 - 500.
Qi Li, Wei Luo, Yaping Wang & Liansheng Wu (2013). Firm Performance, Corporate Ownership, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in China. Business Ethics 22 (1):159-173.
Junwei Shi, Haiyan Fu & Lijun Hu (2007). Social Responsibility, Social Capital, and Corporate Competitive Advantage in Transitional China. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:377-394.
James A. H. S. Hine & Lutz Preuss (2009). “Society is Out There, Organisation is in Here”: On the Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Held by Different Managerial Groups. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (2):381 - 393.
Robert W. Kolodinsky, Timothy M. Madden, Daniel S. Zisk & Eric T. Henkel (2010). Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 91 (2):167 - 181.
W. Kolodinsky Robert, M. Madden Timothy, S. Zisk Daniel & T. Henkel Eric (2010). Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors. Journal of Business Ethics 91 (2).
Andrea J. S. Stanaland, May O. Lwin & Patrick E. Murphy (2011). Consumer Perceptions of the Antecedents and Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (1):47-55.
Added to index2012-01-29
Total downloads14 ( #93,475 of 1,003,927 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,617 of 1,003,927 )
How can I increase my downloads?