David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 2 (May):201-30 (1989)
It is argued thatde dicto andde re beliefs are attitudes towards syntactically structured entities (sentences) in the head. In order to identify the content of ade dicto orde re belief, we must be able to match causal relations of belief states to natural language inferences. Such match-ups provide sufficient empirical justification for regarding those causal relations as syntactic transformations, that is, inferences. But only syntactically structured entities are capable of enjoying such inferential relations. Hence,de dicto andde re beliefs must be syntactically structured. Given that beliefs are also brain states, it follows that they are sentences in the brain. The argument presented here is shown to be an improvement over similar arguments advanced by Harman and Fodor
|Keywords||Belief Causal Explanation Inference Language Sentence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey E. Foss (1997). How Many Beliefs Can Dance in the Head of the Self-Deceived? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):111-112.
John L. Tienson (1990). Is This Any Way to Be a Realist? Philosophical Psychology 3 (1):155-164.
Peter Carruthers (2003). On Fodor's Problem. Mind and Language 18 (5):502-523.
Scott Hendricks (2006). Sententialism and the Problem of Clutter. Acta Analytica 21 (40):74-84.
Scott R. Sehon (2000). An Argument Against the Causal Theory of Action Explanation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):67-85.
Cindy D. Stern (1993). Semantic Emphasis in Causal Sentences. Synthese 95 (3):379 - 418.
Peter Gardenfors (1980). A Pragmatic Approach to Explanations. Philosophy of Science 47 (3):404-423.
Steven Rappaport (1996). Inference to the Best Explanation: Is It Really Different From Mill's Methods? Philosophy of Science 63 (1):65-80.
Ken Warmbrōd (1989). Beliefs and Sentences in the Head. Synthese 79 (2):201 - 230.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #214,234 of 1,102,118 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #306,622 of 1,102,118 )
How can I increase my downloads?