David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 79 (2):201 - 230 (1989)
It is argued thatde dicto andde re beliefs are attitudes towards syntactically structured entities (sentences) in the head. In order to identify the content of ade dicto orde re belief, we must be able to match causal relations of belief states to natural language inferences. Such match-ups provide sufficient empirical justification for regarding those causal relations as syntactic transformations, that is, inferences. But only syntactically structured entities are capable of enjoying such inferential relations. Hence,de dicto andde re beliefs must be syntactically structured. Given that beliefs are also brain states, it follows that they are sentences in the brain. The argument presented here is shown to be an improvement over similar arguments advanced by Harman and Fodor
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Hartry Field (1978). Mental Representation. Erkenntnis 13 (July):9-61.
David Lewis (1979). Attitudes de Dicto and de Se. Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
David K. Lewis (1973). Counterfactuals. Blackwell Publishers.
William G. Lycan (1982). Toward a Homuncular Theory of Believing. Cognition and Brain Theory 4:139-59.
John McCarthy (1979). Ascribing Mental Qualities to Machines. In Martin Ringle (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence. Humanities Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Ken Warmbrōd (1992). Primitive Representation and Misrepresentation. Topoi 11 (1):89-101.
Similar books and articles
Ken Warmbrod (1989). Beliefs and Sentences in the Head. Synthese 2 (May):201-30.
Neil Sinclair (2006). The Moral Belief Problem. Ratio 19 (2):249–260.
Dale Jacquette (1989). Stich againstde dicto‐de reambiguity. Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):223-230.
Scott Hendricks (2006). Sententialism and the Problem of Clutter. Acta Analytica 21 (40):74-84.
Stephen P. Stich (1978). Beliefs and Subdoxastic States. Philosophy of Science 45 (December):499-518.
Lynne Rudder Baker (1994). Attitudes as Nonentities. Philosophical Studies 76 (2-3):175-203.
Richard Feldman (2008). Modest Deontologism in Epistemology. Synthese 161 (3):339 - 355.
George A. Sher (1975). Sentences in the Brain. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36 (September):94-99.
Richard Otte (1990). Scientific Realism, Perceptual Beliefs, and Justification. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:393 - 404.
Brian Loar (1982). Must Beliefs Be Sentences? Philosophy of Science Association 1982:627 - 643.
Moisés Goldszmidt & Judea Pearl (1996). Qualitative Probabilities for Default Reasoning, Belief Revision, and Causal Modeling. Artificial Intelligence 84:57-112.
Hannes Leitgeb (2007). Beliefs in Conditionals Vs. Conditional Beliefs. Topoi 26 (1):115-132.
Jeffrey E. Foss (1997). How Many Beliefs Can Dance in the Head of the Self-Deceived? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):111-112.
Dan Sperber (1997). Intuitive and Reflective Beliefs. Mind and Language 12 (1):67-83.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads5 ( #256,538 of 1,410,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #178,988 of 1,410,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?