Graduate studies at Western
Environmental Ethics 9 (1):3-20 (1987)
|Abstract||The current feminist debate over ecology raises important and timely issues about the theoretical adequacy of the four leading versions of feminism-liberal feminism, traditional Marxist feminism, radical feminism, and socialist feminism. In this paper I present a minimal condition account of ecological feminism, or ecofeminism. I argue that if eco-feminism is true or at least plausible, then each of the four leading versions of feminism is inadequate, incomplete, or problematic as a theoretical grounding for eco-feminism. I conclude that, if eco-feminism is to be taken seriously, then a transformative feminism is needed that will move us beyond the four familiar feminist frameworks and make an eco-feminist perspective central to feminist theory and practice|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patricia Elliot (1995). Politics, Identity, and Social Change: Contested Grounds in Psychoanalytic Feminism. Hypatia 10 (2):41 - 55.
Joyce Outshoorn & Johanna Kantola (eds.) (2007). Changing State Feminism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Iris Marion Young (1983). “Feminism and Ecology” and “Women and Life on Earth: Eco-Feminism in the 80's”. Environmental Ethics 5 (2):173-179.
Karen J. Warren & Jim Cheney (1991). Ecological Feminism and Ecosystem Ecology. Hypatia 6 (1):179 - 197.
Jim Cheney (1987). Eco-Feminism and Deep Ecology. Environmental Ethics 9 (2):115-145.
Imelda Whelehan (1995). Modern Feminist Thought: From the Second Wave to "Post-Feminism". New York University Press.
Karen J. Warren (1990). The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism. Environmental Ethics 12 (2):125-146.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #40,822 of 754,610 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,372 of 754,610 )
How can I increase my downloads?