David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dissertation, University of Toronto (2010)
In his early writings, Kant says that the solution to the puzzle of how morality can serve as a motivating force in human life is nothing less than the “philosophers’ stone.” In this dissertation I show that for years Kant searched for the philosophers’ stone in the concept of “respect” (Achtung), which he understood as the complex effect practical reason has on feeling. I sketch the history of that search in Chapters 1-2. In Chapter 3 I show that Kant’s analysis in Groundwork I is incomplete because it does not explain how respect functions as a feeling in motivating choice. In Chapter 4 I argue that Kant’s subsequent attempt to sidestep this explanation in Groundwork III is unsuccessful, and that his position remains open to a skeptical threat. The argument in the second Critique, which I reconstruct in Chapters 5-6, overcomes this threat, and in doing so explains how the feeling of respect is both painful and pleasurable. In the course of defending these claims, I provide an alternative reading of the shift in Kant’s ethical project from the Groundwork of 1785 to the second Critique of 1788 Against a common view in the literature, I argue that the shift does not concern the direction of Kant’s deduction (from freedom to morality, or morality to freedom); rather, it concerns his view of human sensibility and the resources he thinks we have to make our practical self-understanding intelligible. In the second Critique, I argue, Kant develops a novel approach to moral feeling from the perspective of the human agent; and this in turn clears room in his ethics for a new kind of a priori knowledge—namely, knowledge of what the activity of practical reason must feel like. By way of conclusion, I offer a few reasons for why the form of Kant’s argument in the second Critique is still relevant today, as it shows why we can only address moral skepticism from a first-personal perspective.
|Keywords||Kant Ethics Moral Sensibility Motivational Skepticism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sergio Tenenbaum (2012). The Idea of Freedom and Moral Cognition in Groundwork III. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):555-589.
Melissa Zinkin (2006). Respect for the Law and the Use of Dynamical Terms in Kant's Theory of Moral Motivation. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (1):31-53.
Melissa Zinkin (2012). Kant and the Pleasure of “Mere Reflection”. Inquiry 55 (5):433-453.
Julian Wuerth (2013). Sense and Sensibility in Kant's Practical Agent: Against the Intellectualism of Korsgaard and Sidgwick. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):1-36.
Paul Guyer (2007). Naturalistic and Transcendental Moments in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Inquiry 50 (5):444 – 464.
Henry E. Allison (1990). Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
Carol W. Voeller (2001). The Metaphysics of the Moral Law: Kant's Deduction of Freedom. Garland Pub..
Kenneth R. Westphal (1997). Noumenal Causality Reconsidered: Affection, Agency, and Meaning in Kant. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (2):209 - 245.
Markos Valaris (2008). Inner Sense, Self-Affection, and Temporal Consciousness in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophers' Imprint 8 (4):1-18.
Jens Timmermann (ed.) (2009). Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Rachel Zuckert (2007). Kant's Rationalist Aesthetics. Kant-Studien 98 (4):443-463.
Sally S. Sedgwick (2008). Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Timothy Rosenkoetter (2011). Kant on Construction, Apriority, and the Moral Relevance of Universalization. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1143 - 1174.
Added to index2011-04-25
Total downloads40 ( #35,156 of 1,011,313 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #18,455 of 1,011,313 )
How can I increase my downloads?