David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind 108 (431):503 - 538 (1999)
There is as yet no settled consensus as to what makes a term a logical constant or even as to which terms should be recognized as having this status. This essay sets out and defends a rationale for identifying logical constants. I argue for a two-tiered approach to logical theory. First, a secure, core logical theory recognizes only a minimal set of constants needed for deductively systematizing scientific theories. Second, there are extended logical theories whose objectives are to systematize various pre-theoretic, modal intuitions. The latter theories may recognize a variety of additional constants as needed in order to formalize a given set of intuitions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dag Westerståhl (2012). From Constants to Consequence, and Back. Synthese 187 (3):957-971.
Mario Gomez-Torrente (2002). The Problem of Logical Constants. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):1-37.
Corine Besson, Understanding the Logical Constants and Dispositions. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication (2010).
John MacFarlane, Logical Constants. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Alexander Yashin (1999). New Intuitionistic Logical Constants and Novikov Completeness. Studia Logica 63 (2):151-180.
Ignacio Jane (1997). Theoremhood and Logical Consequence. Theoria 12 (1):139-160.
Mario Gómez-Torrente (2003). The 'Must' and the 'Heptahedron': Remarks on Remarks. Theoria 18 (2):199-206.
Kosta Došen (1985). Sequent-Systems for Modal Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (1):149-168.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #37,222 of 1,003,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #22,059 of 1,003,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?