Radical interpretation and the Gunderson game
Dialectica 43 (3):271-280 (1989)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Artificial Intelligence Epistemology Interpretation Turing Machines Gunderson, K | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesC. Crawford (1994). Notes on the Turing Test. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 37 (June):13-15.
E. Ronald & Moshe Sipper (2001). Intelligence is Not Enough: On the Socialization of Talking Machines. Minds and Machines 11 (4):567-576.
Luciano Floridi, Mariarosaria Taddeo & Matteo Turilli (2008). Turing’s Imitation Game: Still an Impossible Challenge for All Machines and Some Judges. Minds and Machines 19 (1):145-150.
Terry L. Rankin (1987). The Turing Paradigm: A Critical Assessment. Dialogue 29 (April):50-55.
Aaron Sloman (2002). The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to Artificial Intelligence. In Matthias Scheutz (ed.), Computationalism: New Directions. MIT Press.
Dale Jacquette (1993). Who's Afraid of the Turing Test? Behavior and Philosophy 20 (21):63-74.
Saul Traiger (2000). Making the Right Identification in the Turing Test. Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572.
James H. Moor (2001). The Status and Future of the Turing Test. Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
Gerald J. Erion (2001). The Cartesian Test for Automatism. Minds and Machines 11 (1):29-39.
Glenn C. Joy (1989). Gunderson and Searle: A Common Error About Artificial Intelligence. Southwest Philosophical Studies 28:28-34.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
