David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2 & 3):151 – 167 (2007)
This article proposes an eclectic and holistic model of ethics and ethical thinking. It uses this tripart model to show how partialities can be integrated into impartial moral reasoning. Ethical reasoning is divided into three problem areas or "levels" - cases, frameworks, and ultimate ethical goals. Each level employs its own form of reasoning. For evaluating cases, the author advocates an eclectic application of principles; for evaluating frameworks of principles, the author advocates contractualism; for evaluating ethical theory as a whole, the author advocates a notion of the human good inspired by Aristotelian perfectionism. This article argues that utilitarianism, which is one part of eclectic deliberation, is hampered by the idea that ethical reasoning must be based on a single moral criterion or "master" principle. The article concludes by showing how this eclectic model, supplemented by "mitigated impartialism," provides a systematic method for assessing partialities, with reference to the problem of patriotism in journalism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
W. D. Ross (2002). The Right and the Good. Clarendon Press.
J. Rawls (1995). Political Liberalism. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Thomas Hurka (1993). Perfectionism. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Shixin Ivy Zhang (2009). What's Wrong with Chinese Journalists? Addressing Journalistic Ethics in China Through a Case Study of the Beijing Youth Daily. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 (2 & 3):173 – 188.
Similar books and articles
Alisa L. Carse (1998). Impartial Principle and Moral Context: Securing a Place for the Particular in Ethical Theory. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (2):153 – 169.
Eugene Schlossberger (2006). Setting Premiums Ethically. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):331-337.
Avrum Stroll (2002). Interpretation and Meaning. Inquiry 45 (2):145 – 160.
H. Kuhse, P. Singer, M. Rickard, L. Cannold & J. van Dyk (1997). Partial and Impartial Ethical Reasoning in Health Care Professionals. Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (4):226-232.
Peter Coghlan (2005). The Prodigal and His Brother: Impartiality and the Equal Consideration of Interests. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3):195-206.
David Shaw (2008). Deaf by Design: Disability and Impartiality. Bioethics 22 (8):407-413.
Andrew Reisner (2008). Does Friendship Give Us Non-Derivative Partial Reasons. Les Ateliers de l'Éthique / the Ethics Forum 3 (1):70-78.
Brad Hooker (2010). When is Impartiality Morally Appropriate? In Brian Feltham & John Cottingham (eds.), Partiality and Impartiality: Morality, Special Relationships, and the Wider World. OUP Oxford
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #194,523 of 1,726,239 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,239 )
How can I increase my downloads?