Graduate studies at Western
Ethics and Information Technology 10 (1):27-40 (2008)
|Abstract||This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the privacy rights dilemma surrounding radio frequency identification (RFID) technology. As one example of ubiquitous information system, RFID has multitudinous applications in various industries and businesses across society. The use of this technology will have to lead to a policy setting dilemma in that a balance between individuals’ privacy concerns and the benefits that they derive from it must be drawn. After describing the basic RFID technology some of its most prevalent uses, a definition of privacy is derived in the context of information systems. To illustrate current attempts at controlling the undesirable side effects of RFID, Lessig’s cyberspace framework is presented. It is found that each of Lessig’s components is inadequate at preventing individual privacy violations in RFID. The main focus within this framework is on the norms of society. The social norm mechanism that addresses privacy issues in cyberspace is the Fair Information Practices Principles (FIPP). After an analysis of these principles, it is posited that the FIPP only deal with procedural justice issues related to data collection and omit distributive and interactional justice reasoning related to the actual beneficial and detrimental outcomes to the individuals whose data is being obtained. Thus, RFID is presented in the context of the tension between the many benefits that are provided by the technology in social exchanges, and the risk it carries of the loss of privacy. The new, expanded framework recognizes both sides of the issue with the ultimate goal of providing a greater understanding of how privacy issues can be addressed with RFID technology|
|Keywords||Lessig framework RFID technology ethics justice theories privacy ubiquitous computing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Allen S. Weiss (1995). Phantasmic Radio. Duke University Press.
Jeroen Van Den Hoven & Pieter E. Vermaas (2007). Nano-Technology and Privacy: On Continuous Surveillance Outside the Panopticon. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (3):283 – 297.
Anton Alterman (2003). ``A Piece of Yourself'': Ethical Issues in Biometric Identification. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 5 (3):139-150.
Kenneth R. Foster & Jan Jaeger (2008). Ethical Implications of Implantable Radiofrequency Identification (RFID) Tags in Humans. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):44 – 48.
Vance Lockton & Richard S. Rosenberg (2005). RFID: The Next Serious Threat to Privacy. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):221-231.
Alan R. Peslak (2005). An Ethical Exploration of Privacy and Radio Frequency Identification. Journal of Business Ethics 59 (4):327 - 345.
Vladimir Labay & Amber McKee Anderson (2006). Ethical Considerations and Proposed Guidelines for the Use of Radio Frequency Identification: Especially Concerning its Use for Promoting Public Safety and National Security. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (2):265-272.
Dara J. Glasser, Kenneth W. Goodman & Norman G. Einspruch (2007). Chips, Tags and Scanners: Ethical Challenges for Radio Frequency Identification. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2):101-109.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #293,975 of 753,130 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?