Aus meiner Erfahrung der japanischen Übersetzung von Sein und Zeit
Studia Phaenomenologica 5:153-168 (2005)
| Abstract | I have first translated Sein und Zeit in Japanese in 1971 in collaboration with my elder colleague Prof. Hara in Tokyo. But in 1976 both he and Martin Heidegger died, and in 1977 a new edition of Sein und Zeit was published as part of Heidegger’s complete works. This new edition included many marginal notes of Heidegger’s and many textual revisions made by Heidegger himself. Therefore, I have published in 2003, based on the old version of my Japanese translation, a totally revised Japanese translation of Sein und Zeit, in which, as translator, I have written a new introduction, many explicatory notes about Heidegger’s marginal notes and textual modifications and a chronological detailed record of Heidegger’s career. Out of this experience, I would like to detail upon two aspects: first, any nowadays reader of this work must study not only the original text itself, but also, by all means, Heidegger’s marginal notes, in order to correctly grasp a development of his thought on Being. Secondary, a reader must especially pay attention to the difficult problem of the relationship between authenticity and inauthenticity of the Being-in-the-world, because here is the most basic problem of the existence of Dasein and it is here the place where the turning point in Heidegger’s later thought on Being has its origin | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRichard Schmitt (1967). Can Heidegger Be Understood? Inquiry 10 (1-4):53 – 73.
Thomas Sheehan & Corinne Painter (1999). Choosing One's Fate: A Re-Reading of Sein Und Zeit §74. Research in Phenomenology 29 (1):63-82.
Herman Philipse (1999). Heidegger's Grand (Pascalian) Strategy. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:49-64.
Martin Heidegger (2011). Die „Seinsfrage" in ,Sein Und Zeit'. Das Transzendentale in ,Sein Und Zeit'. Heidegger Studies 27:9-12.
Rudolf Boehm (2005). L'être et le temps d'une traduction. Studia Phaenomenologica 5:101-104.
Marcia Sá Cavalcante Schuback (2005). Die Gabe und Aufgabe des Währenden. Studia Phaenomenologica 5:201-214.
Brent A. Singer (1988). Sein Und Zeit Revisited. Philosophy Research Archives 14:311-332.
Richard Matz (2005). Some Words About My Way to Heidegger. Studia Phaenomenologica 5:253-255.
Martin Heidegger (1958). What is Philosophy? [New York]Twayne Publishers.
François Vezin (2005). Vingt ans après. Studia Phaenomenologica 5:105-117.
Reijo Kupiainen (2005). Finnish Approaches to Sein Und Zeit. Studia Phaenomenologica 5:91-99.
Alfredo Marini (2005). La nouvelle traduction italienne d'Être et temps. Studia Phaenomenologica 5:137-151.
Rainer Schubert (2004). Zum Problem der Erkenntnis in Heideggers Sein und Zeit. Studia Phaenomenologica 4 (1-2):173-188.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-12-02Total downloads3 ( #201,730 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
