David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):526-527 (2010)
Descartes and the Puzzle of Sensory Representation is an intensely polemical attack on many recent expositions of sensory representation in Descartes, and a defense of De Rosa’s own Descriptive-Causal Account of Sensory Representation. For Descartes, she says, there are two kinds of ideas, sensible and intelligible, both of which have presentational and referential content. The presentational content of sensible ideas consists of touches, tastes, sounds, odors, and colored visual images that are obscure and confused, in that there is nothing like these sensible ideas in the material world. The presentational content of intelligible ideas, on the other hand, is clear and distinct, in that it consists of geometric representations of material bodies that do exist in the world outside the mind. Thus, whenever one has a clear and distinct intelligible perception of a material body that exists outside the mind, one also has at the same time an obscure and confused sensible image of that body as hard, sweet, squeaky, odiferous, and colored. Nothing like these sensible images actually exists in bodies. De Rosa says that the role of sensible imagery is to individuate and differentiate material bodies from one another, which would be difficult to do for
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Raffaella De Rosa (2013). Descartes and the Puzzle of Sensory Representation: Précis. Analytic Philosophy 54 (1):93-96.
Tom Vinci (2013). Raffaella De Rosa's Descartes and the Puzzle of Sensory Representation. Analytic Philosophy 54 (1):97-106.
Raffaella De Rosa (2009). Cartesian Sensations. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):780-792.
Alison Simmons (2003). Descartes on the Cognitive Structure of Sensory Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):549–579.
Ann Wilbur MacKenzie (1990). Descartes on Sensory Representation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (Supplement):109-147.
Richard A. Watson (1991). Subjectivity and Representation in Descartes: The Origins of Modernity. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (4):675-677.
Deborah J. Brown (2006). Descartes and the Passionate Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Amy Morgan Schmitter (1994). Representation, Self-Representation, and the Passions in Descartes. Review of Metaphysics 48 (2):331 - 357.
David Clemenson (2010). Review of Raffaella de Rosa, Descartes and the Puzzle of Sensory Representation. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (6).
Ken Warmbrod (1992). Primitive Representation and Misrepresentation. Topoi 11 (1):89-101.
David Landy (2011). Descartes' Compositional Theory of Mental Representation. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):214-231.
Jennifer Hudin (2006). Motor Intentionality and its Primordiality. Inquiry 49 (6):573 – 590.
Dan Ryder, Explaining the "Inhereness" of Qualia Representationally: Why We Seem to Have a Visual Field.
Gregg Caruso (2005). Sensory States, Consciousness, and the Cartesian Assumption. In Nathan Smith and Jason Taylor (ed.), Descartes and Cartesianism. Cambridge Scholars Press
Added to index2010-10-12
Total downloads14 ( #268,118 of 1,934,839 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #196,347 of 1,934,839 )
How can I increase my downloads?