David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 28 (2):174-189 (2011)
My central claim in this paper is that Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling is governed by the basic aim to articulate a real dilemma, and to elicit its proper recognition as such. I begin by indicating how Kierkegaard’s works are shaped in general by this aim, and what the aim involves. I then show how the dilemmaticstructure of Fear and Trembling is obscured in a recent dispute between Michelle Kosch and John Lippitt regarding the basic aims and upshot of the book. Finally, I consider two critical questions: Why does Kierkegaard present his dilemmatic reasoning in the form of a “dialectical lyric”? And why does he write a book that aims only to articulate a dilemma, and not also to resolve it?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Lippitt (2003). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kierkegaard and Fear and Trembling. Routledge.
Amy Laura Hall (2000). Self-Deception, Confusion, and Salvation in "Fear and Trembling" with "Works of Love". Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):37 - 61.
Paul Dietrichson (1969). Ii. Introduction to a Reappraisal of Fear and Trembling. Inquiry 12 (1-4):236 – 245.
Paolo Diego Bubbio (2012). Kierkegaard's Regulative Sacrifice: A Post-Kantian Reading ofFear and Trembling. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (5):691-723.
Jerome I. Gellmann (2001). Fear and Trembling: Kierkegaard's Christian Work. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):61-74.
Jerome I. Gellmann (2001). Fear and Trembling. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):61-74.
John Lippitt (2008). What Neither Abraham nor Johannes de Silentio Could Say. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):79-99.
Ronald M. Green (1993). Enough is Enough! "Fear and Trembling" is Not About Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (2):191-209.
Bruce Russell (1975). What is the Ethical in Fear and Trembling? Inquiry 18 (3):337 – 343.
Michelle Kosch (2006). Kierkegaard's Ethicist: Fichte's Role in Kierkegaard's Construction of the Ethical Standpoint. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (3):261-295.
John W. Elrod (1983). Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling: Critical Appraisals. Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (2):261-263.
Steven Sych (2011). Clare Carlisle, Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling: A Reader's Guide. [REVIEW] Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 15 (2):213-215.
Sharon Krishek (2010). The Enactment of Love by Faith. Faith and Philosophy 27 (1):3-21.
Jerome I. Gellman (1990). Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling. Man and World 23 (3):295-304.
James Bogen (1962). Kierkegaard and the 'Teleological Suspension of the Ethical'. Inquiry 5 (1-4):305-317.
Added to index2011-03-01
Total downloads234 ( #7,972 of 1,780,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)145 ( #3,642 of 1,780,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?