David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):449-488 (2004)
: This paper argues that Kant's model of causality cannot consist in one temporally determinate event causing another, as Hume had thought, since such a model is inconsistent with mutual interaction, to which Kant is committed in the Third Analogy. Rather causality occurs when one substance actively exercises its causal powers according to the unchanging grounds that constitute its nature so as to determine a change of state of another substance. Because this model invokes unchanging grounds, one can understand how Kant could have thought that causal laws could be justified. Further, because this model, along with the broader ontology it presupposes, is radically different from Hume's, Kant's Second Analogy cannot be understood as a refutation of Hume's position on Hume's own terms; instead, Kant must be proposing an alternative view that competes against Hume's thoroughgoing empiricist account.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jonas Jervell Indregard (forthcoming). Kant's Causal Power Argument Against Empirical Affection. Kantian Review.
James Kreines (2009). Kant on the Laws of Nature: Laws, Necessitation, and the Limitation of Our Knowledge. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):527-558.
Daniel Whistler (2013). Post-Established Harmony: Kant and Analogy Reconsidered. Sophia 52 (2):235-258.
Similar books and articles
David Wiggins (1995). Categorical Requirements: Kant and Hume on the Idea of Duty. In Rosalind Hursthouse, Gavin Lawrence & Warren Quinn (eds.), The Monist. Clarendon Press 297-330.
Wayne Waxman (1994). Hume's Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Lucy Allais (2006). Intrinsic Natures: A Critique of Langton on Kant. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):143–169.
Wayne Waxman (1991). Kant's Model of the Mind: A New Interpretation of Transcendental Idealism. Oxford University Press.
Michael J. Olson (2010). The Intuition of Simultaneity: Zugleichsein and the Constitution of Extensive Magnitudes. Kant-Studien 101 (4):429-444.
Gregg Osborne (2007). Does Kant Refute Hume's Derivation of the Concept of Cause? Journal of Philosophical Research 32:293-318.
Thomas Sturm (2004). Manfred Kuehn: Kant - A Biography. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 54:476-479.
Boris Hennig (2011). Kants Modell Kausaler Beziehungen. Zu Watkins' Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Kant-Studien 102 (3):367-384.
Eric Watkins (2004). Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads136 ( #29,274 of 1,934,364 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #58,817 of 1,934,364 )
How can I increase my downloads?