Particulars, universals and verification

Philosophy of Science 7 (1):81-91 (1940)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If the truth of a given sentence, ‘P’ depends upon a certain non-linguistic fact, P then, how is the P without inverted commas involved in the statement, “ ‘P’ is true when P“? How is ‘P’ related to P? My answer suggests that any discussion of these questions leads inevitably to the ancient problem of particulars and universals.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Universals and particulars: readings in ontology.Michael J. Loux (ed.) - 1970 - Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Russell on the Relations of Universals and Particulars.Larry Lee Blackman - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:265-278.
"Bare particulars".Theodore Sider - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Universals and particulars in a phenomenalist ontology.E. D. Klemke - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (3):254-261.
Structural Universals and Formal Relations.Joan Pagés - 2002 - Synthese 131 (2):215 - 221.
Particulars, Universals and Russell’s Late Ontology.Herbert Hochberg - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:129-137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
17 (#819,600)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references