David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 54 (3):453-464 (1987)
Clark Glymour has argued that hypothetico-deductivism, which many take to be an important method of scientific confirmation, is hopeless because it cannot be reconstructed in classical logic. Such reconstructions, as Glymour points out, fail to uphold the condition of relevance between theory and evidence. I argue that the source of the irrelevant confirmations licensed by these reconstructions lies not with hypothetico-deductivism itself, but with the classical logic in which it is typically reconstructed. I present a new reconstruction of hypothetico-deductivism in relevance logic that does maintain the condition of relevance between theory and evidence. Hence, if hypothetico-deductivism is an important rationale in science, we have good reason to believe that the logic underlying scientific discourse is captured better by relevance logic than by its classical counterpart
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William W. Rozeboom (1982). Let's Dump Hypothetico-Deductivism for the Right Reasons. Philosophy of Science 49 (4):637-647.
Ken Gemes (1994). Schurz on Hypothetico-Deductivism. Erkenntnis 41 (2):171 - 181.
Ken Gemes (2005). Hypothetico-Deductivism: Incomplete but Not Hopeless. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 63 (1):139-147.
Luca Moretti (2006). The Tacking by Disjunction Paradox: Bayesianism Versus Hypothetico-Deductivism. Erkenntnis 64 (1):115-138.
Ken Gemes (1993). Hypothetico-Deductivism, Content, and the Natural Axiomatization of Theories. Philosophy of Science 60 (3):477-487.
Clark Glymour (1980). Hypothetico-Deductivism is Hopeless. Philosophy of Science 47 (2):322-325.
Ken Gemes (1990). Horwich, Hempel, and Hypothetico-Deductivism. Philosophy of Science 57 (4):699-702.
David Christensen (1983). Glymour on Evidential Relevance. Philosophy of Science 50 (3):471-481.
Suck-Jung Park (2004). Hypothetico-Deductivism is Still Hopeless. Erkenntnis 60 (2):229-234.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #208,684 of 1,777,407 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #289,892 of 1,777,407 )
How can I increase my downloads?