Heraclitus

The Monist 74 (4):605-623 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nietzsche exempts Heraclitus from the charge levelled at other philosophes that in denigrating the senses and the body, and in dehistoricizing concepts, they kill them and stuff them, turning them into mummies. Nietzsche’s admiration of Heraclitus is not surprising in light of the resemblances between the two writers, not the least of which is that they inspire so many divergent, and contradictory, readings. As it becomes increasingly clear—thanks to Nietzsche and to those whom he inspired—that much more is contingent than we had thought, one hesitates to make too much of stylistic coincidence. Still it is worth exploring whether there is a connection between the style, structure, and content of what they wrote, and the extraordinary range of readings ascribed to the writings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
66 (#240,625)

6 months
9 (#298,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Editing Heraclitus (1999-2012).Serge Mouraviev - 2013 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2):195-218.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references