David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 17 (1):87 - 97 (1998)
The theory of corporations as moral persons was first advanced by Peter French some fifteen years ago. French persuasively argued that corporations, as persons, have moral responsibility in pretty much the same way that most human beings are said to have moral responsibility. One of the crucial features of French's argument has been his reliance on the idea that corporations are "intentional systems," that they have beliefs and desires just as humans do. But this feature of French's thought has been left largely undeveloped. Applying some philosophical ideas of Daniel Dennett, this article provides support for French's contention that corporations are intentional actors by analyzing what is meant by the term "intentional system," and showing why corporations should be thought of as, in many important ways, indistinguishable from humans.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Eva E. Tsahuridu (2006). Anomie and Ethics at Work. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):163-174.
Similar books and articles
John Douglas Bishop (2008). For-Profit Corporations in a Just Society. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (2):191-212.
Paul C. Nystrom (1990). Differences in Moral Values Between Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (12):971 - 979.
David T. Ozar (1985). Do Corporations Have Moral Rights? Journal of Business Ethics 4 (4):277 - 281.
Michael J. Kerlin (1997). Peter French, Corporate Ethics and the Wizard of Oz. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1431-1438.
Nani L. Ranken (1987). Corporations as Persons: Objections to Goodpaster's 'Principle of Moral Projection'. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 6 (8):633 - 637.
Lukas Böök (1999). Towards a Theory of Reflexive Intentional Systems. Synthese 118 (1):105 - 117.
John Hasnas (2012). Reflections on Corporate Moral Responsibility and the Problem Solving Technique of Alexander the Great. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):183-195.
Raymond S. Pfeiffer (1990). The Central Distinction in the Theory of Corporate Moral Personhood. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (6):473-480.
Michael J. Phillips (1992). Corporate Moral Personhood and Three Conceptions of the Corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (4):435-459.
Rita C. Manning (1988). Dismemberment, Divorce and Hostile Takeovers: A Comment on Corporate Moral Personhood. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (8):639 - 643.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #178,779 of 1,088,777 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,777 )
How can I increase my downloads?