David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
HEC Forum 6 (5):323-325 (1994)
Substantial efforts have recently been made to reform the physician-patient relationship, particularly toward replacing the `silent world of doctor and patient' with informed patient participation in medical decision-making. This 'new ethos of patient autonomy' has especially insisted on the routine provision of informed consent for all medical interventions. Stronly supported by most bioethicists and the law, as well as more popular writings and expectations, it still seems clear that informed consent has, at best, been received in a lukewarm fashion by most clinicians, many simply rejecting what they commonly refer to as the `myth of informed consent'. The purpose of this book is to defuse this seemingly intractable controversy by offering an efficient and effective operational model of informed consent. This goal is pursued first by reviewing and evaluating, in detail, the agendas, arguments, and supporting materials of its proponents and detractors. A comprehensive review of empirical studies of informed consent is provided, as well as a detailed reflection on the common clinician experience with attempts at informed consent and the exercise of autonomy by patients. In the end, informed consent is recast as a management tool for pursuing clinically and ethically important goods and values that any clinician should see as meriting pursuit. Concurrently, the model incorporates a flexible, anticipatory approach that recognizes that no static, generic ritual can legitimately pursue the quite variable goods and values that may be at stake with different patients in different situations. Finally, efficiency of provision is addressed by not pursuing the unattainable and ancillary. Throughout, the traditional principle of beneficence is appealed to toward articulating an operational model of informed consent as an intervention that is likely to change outcomes at the bedside for the better.
|Keywords||Informed consent (Medical law Medical ethics Ethics, Medical Informed Consent Patient Participation Physician-Patient Relations|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$121.22 used (42% off) $155.96 new (26% off) $209.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||R724.W355 1993|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Bernd Alt-Epping & Friedemann Nauck (2012). Der Wunsch des Patienten–ein eigenständiger normativer Faktor in der klinischen Therapieentscheidung? Ethik in der Medizin 24 (1):19-28.
Miles Little (2009). The Role of Regret in Informed Consent. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):49-59.
Bernd Alt-Epping & Friedemann Nauck (2012). Der Wunsch des Patienten – ein eigenständiger normativer Faktor in der klinischen Therapieentscheidung? Ethik in der Medizin 24 (1):19-28.
Elisabeth Hildt (2009). Predictive Genetic Testing, Autonomy and Responsibility for Future Health. Medicine Studies 1 (2):143-153.
Udo Schuklenk (2003). AIDS: Bioethics and Public Policy. New Review of Bioethics 1 (1):127-144.
Similar books and articles
David B. Annis (1984). Informed Consent, Autonomy, and the Law. Philosophy Research Archives 10:249-259.
Akira Akabayashi & Brian Taylor Slingsby (2006). Informed Consent Revisited: Japan and the U.S. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):9 – 14.
J. Pasek (1995). Informed Consent. Patient Autonomy and Physician Beneficence Within Clinical Medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (2):119-120.
N. Stoljar (2011). Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):375-384.
Jay Katz (1984/2002). The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stephen Wear (1999). Enhancing Clinician Provision of Informed Consent and Counseling: Some Pedagogical Strategies. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):34 – 42.
Richard T. Hull (1985). Informed Consent: Patient's Right or Patient's Duty? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):183-198.
Sheila McLean (2010). Autonomy, Consent and the Law. Routledge-Cavendish.
Jukka Varelius (2012). On Taylor's Justification of Medical Informed Consent. Bioethics 26 (4):207-214.
Deborah Bowman (2011). Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #81,214 of 1,781,334 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #167,920 of 1,781,334 )
How can I increase my downloads?