David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Nursing Philosophy 9 (3):180-194 (2008)
Abstract The strength of a discipline is reflected in the development of a set of concepts relevant to its practice domain. As an evolving professional discipline, nursing requires further development in this respect. Over the past two decades in North America there have emerged three different approaches to concept analysis in nursing scholarship: Wilsonian-derived, evolutionary, and pragmatic utility. The present paper compares and contrasts these three methods of concept in terms of purpose, procedures, philosophical underpinnings, limitations, guidance for researchers, and ability to contribute to nursing knowledge and disciplinary advancement. This work extends prior criticisms of concept analysis methods, especially as formulated by Morse and colleagues, by promoting further critical discussion regarding the direction and effectiveness of nursing efforts to meet the basic needs of disciplinary development. Its central thesis is that nursing concept analysis must advance beyond the Wilsonian-derived methods of Walker and Avant by devoting greater attention to understanding the domain of concepts to be analysed and deriving features from these contexts.
|Keywords||boundary work concept maturity Rodgers Evolutionary Wilsonian‐derived Morse Criterion‐based pragmatic utility nursing discipline|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peggy L. Chinn, Maeona K. Kramer & Peggy L. Chin (2004). Integrated Knowledge Development in Nursing.
Thomas F. Gieryn (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science Credibility on the Line. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Kathleen Astin Knafl & Beth L. Rodgers (1993). Concept Development in Nursing Foundations, Techniques, and Applications. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Howard J. Curzer (1993). Fry's Concept of Care in Nursing Ethics. Hypatia 8 (3):174 - 183.
Mark W. Risjord (2010). Nursing Knowledge: Science, Practice, and Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell Pub..
Danielle BlondeauRN PhD (2002). Nursing Art as a Practical Art: The Necessary Relationship Between Nursing Art and Nursing Ethics. Nursing Philosophy 3 (3):252–259.
Ian E. Thompson, Kath M. Melia & Kenneth M. Boyd (eds.) (2006). Nursing Ethics. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
Martha Mackay (2009). Why Nursing has Not Embraced the Clinician–Scientist Role. Nursing Philosophy 10 (4):287-296.
Sandra Mackey (2009). Towards an Ontological Theory of Wellness: A Discussion of Conceptual Foundations and Implications for Nursing. Nursing Philosophy 10 (2):103-112.
Joy Hinson Penticuff (1991). Conceptual Issues in Nursing Ethics Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (3):235-258.
Paula N. Kagan, Marlaine C. Smith, I. I. I. Cowling & Peggy L. Chinn (2010). A Nursing Manifesto: An Emancipatory Call for Knowledge Development, Conscience, and Praxis. Nursing Philosophy 11 (1):67-84.
Kathryn Weaver RN PhD & Carl Mitcham PhD (2008). Nursing Concept Analysis in North America: State of the Art. Nursing Philosophy 9 (3):180–194.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #108,415 of 1,700,311 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,311 )
How can I increase my downloads?