David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review 6 (2-3):153-170 (1992)
Is it possible to reconcile a classical liberal approach to economics with a concern for the environment? The contributors to Economics and the Environment: A Reconciliation contend that it is. But they fail to distinguish properly between classical liberalism and a widespread orthodoxy in environmental policy communities in Europe and North America to the effect that economic instruments for environmental policy need more serious attention than they have hitherto received. Once this orthodoxy is distinguished from classical liberalism, the latter is seen to be implausible. In particular, the classical liberal approach fails to deal with the practical and administrative problems involved in enforcing private property rights solutions to problems of environmental protection, wrongly generalizes from the failures of U.S. environmental policy to the failure of public regulation as such, and fails to take into account the claim that nature should be accorded intrinsic value
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
David Lyons (1965). Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
W. G. Runciman & Brian Barry (1967). Political Argument. Philosophical Quarterly 17 (66):87.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeffrey Friedman (1992). Politics or Scholarship? Critical Review 6 (2-3):429-445.
Similar books and articles
Roger Taylor (1992). The Environmental Implications of Liberalism. Critical Review 6 (2-3):265-282.
Andrew T. Brei (2013). Rights & Nature. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):393-408.
Bstan-ʼ & Dzin-Rgya-Mtsho (2007). His Holiness the Xiv Dalai Lama on Environment: Collected Statements. Environment and Development Desk, Dept. Of Information and International Relations, Central Tibetan Administration.
Laura Westra (2009). Why Norton's Approach is Insufficient for Environmental Ethics. In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Temple University Press. 279-297.
Robert Frodeman (2004). Environmental Philosophy and the Shaping of Public Policy. Environmental Philosophy 1 (1):6-12.
Robert E. Manning (1999). Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207.
Ben A. Minteer & Robert E. Manning (1999). Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics: Democracy, Pluralism, and the Management of Nature. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207.
Peter C. Yeager (1992). The Politics of Efficiencies, the Efficiencies of Politics: States Vs. Markets in Environmental Protection. Critical Review 6 (2-3):231-253.
Michael Getzner, Clive L. Spash & Sigrid Stagl (eds.) (2005). Alternatives for Environmental Valuation. Routledge.
Alex Latta & Hannah Wittman (eds.) (2012). Environment and Citizenship in Latin America: Natures, Subjects and Struggles. Berghahn Books.
Troy W. Hartley (1995). Environmental Justice. Environmental Ethics 17 (3):277-289.
Mark Sagoff (1992). Free‐Market Versus Libertarian Environmentalism. Critical Review 6 (2-3):211-230.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-07-29
Total downloads1 ( #306,128 of 1,088,400 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,400 )
How can I increase my downloads?