The asymmetric magnets problem
Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):479–492 (2006)
| Abstract | There are many controversial theses about intrinsicness and duplication. The first aim of this paper is to introduce a puzzle that shows that two of the uncontroversial sounding ones can’t both be true. The second aim is to suggest that the best way out of the puzzle requires sharpening some distinctions that are too frequently blurred, and adopting a fairly radical reconception of the ways things are. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Joel Wisner & Joseph Gilbert (2010). Mattel, Lead Paint, and Magnets: Ethics and Supply Chain Management. Ethics and Behavior 20 (1):33-46.
Joel Wisner & Joseph Gilbert (2010). Mattel, Lead Paint, and Magnets: Ethics and Supply Chain Management. Ethics and Behavior 20 (1):33-46.
Jan-Willem Romeyn (2005). Enantiomorphy and Time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):167-190.
Jan-Willem Romeijn (2005). Enantiomorphy and Time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):167 – 190.
Robert C. Robinson (2007). S5 Solution to the Red Hat Puzzle. Disputatio 2 (22).
Martha I. Gibson (1996). Asymmetric Dependencies, Ideal Conditions, and Meaning. Philosophical Psychology 9 (2):235-59.
Huw Price (2002). Boltzmann's Time Bomb. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):83-119.
Mario Castagnino, Manuel Gadella & Olimpia Lombardi (2005). Time's Arrow and Irreversibility in Time-Asymmetric Quantum Mechanics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):223 – 243.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #180,404 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

