David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (4):473-493 (2012)
There are two discourses that are used in connection with the provision of good healthcare: a rights discourse and a beneficial design discourse. Although the logical force of these two discourses overlaps, they have distinct and incompatible implications for practical reasoning about health policy. The language of rights can be interpreted as the ground of a well-designed healthcare system stressing the values of equality and inclusion, but it has less application when dealing with questions of cost-effectiveness. This difference reflects the distinction between the deontological status of rights claims and a teleological approach presupposed in the language of beneficial design. However, the value of the separateness of persons contained in the discourse of rights can impose constraints on the adoption of a simple maximizing principle when thinking about the allocation of healthcare resources within a social contract for health. Throughout these issues are discussed by reference to the work of Peter Jones
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
H. L. A. Hart (1983). Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Robert Nozick (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books.
John Rawls (2009/2005). A Theory of Justice. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Ethics: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Joseph Raz (1975). Practical Reason and Norms. Hutchinson.
Citations of this work BETA
David Miller (2012). Grounding Human Rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (4):407-427.
Similar books and articles
Andrew Papanikitas (2013). Medical Ethics and Sociology. Elsevier/Mosby.
Robert A. Pearlman (1992). An Ethical Framework for Rationing Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):79-96.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (1999). The Commodification of Medical and Health Care: The Moral Consequences of a Paradigm Shift From a Professional to a Market Ethic. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):243 – 266.
Dani Filc (2007). The Liberal Grounding of the Right to Health Care: An Egalitarian Critique. Theoria 54 (112):51-72.
Norman Daniels (1985). Just Health Care. Cambridge University Press.
John Hardwig (1987). Robin Hoods and Good Samaritans: The Role of Patients in Health Care Distribution. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (1).
Dan W. Brock (2001). Children's Rights to Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2):163 – 177.
Alan Cribb (2005). Health and the Good Society: Setting Healthcare Ethics in Social Context. Oxford University Press.
Mark Henaghan (2011). Health Professionals and Trust: The Cure for Healthcare Law and Policy. Routledge-Cavendish.
H. E. Emson (1992). Rights, Duties and Responsibilities in Health Care. Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (1):3-11.
George J. Annas (2010). Worst Case Bioethics: Death, Disaster, and Public Health. Oxford University Press.
John J. Polder & Henk Jochemsen (2000). Professional Autonomy in the Health Care System. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (5):477-491.
B. Andrew Lustig (1993). The Common Good in a Secular Society: The Relevance of a Roman Catholic Notion to the Healthcare Allocation Debate. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (6):569-587.
J. T. Eberl, E. D. Kinney & M. J. Williams (2012). Foundation For A Natural Right To Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (6):537-557.
Norman Daniels (2008). Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2012-08-08
Total downloads5 ( #178,728 of 1,088,427 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,427 )
How can I increase my downloads?