|Abstract||Patrick Greenough has argued that a predicate is vague iff it is epistemically tolerant. I show that there are some counterexamples to this analysis, and that it rests on some fairly contentious theories about the behaviour of vague terms in propositional attitude reports.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Chad Carmichael (2011). Vague Composition Without Vague Existence. Noûs 45 (2):315-327.
Dennis Earl (2010). Vague Analysis. Metaphysica 11 (2):223-233.
Patrick Greenough (2005). Contextualism About Vagueness and Higher-Order Vagueness. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79 (1):167–190.
W. G. Hale (1889). Allen and Greenough's Latin Grammar Allen and Greenough's Latin Grammar for Schools and Colleges. Founded on Comparative Grammar. Revised and Enlarged by James Bradstreet Greenough, Assisted by George L. Kittredge. Boston and London : Ginn and Co. $1.20. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 3 (04):167-172.
Stewart Shapiro & Patrick Greenough (2005). Stewart Shapiro. Context, Conversation, and so-Called 'Higher-Order Vagueness'. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79 (1):147–165.
Jonas Åkerman & Patrick Greenough (2009). Vagueness and Non-Indexical Contextualism. In Sarah Sawyer (ed.), New Waves in Philosophy of Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jonas Åkerman & Patrick Greenough (2010). Hold the Context Fixed, Vagueness Still Remains. In Sebastiano Moruzzi & Richard Dietz (eds.), Cuts and Clouds. Oxford University Press.
Patrick Greenough (2003). Vagueness: A Minimal Theory. Mind 112 (446):235-281.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #78,761 of 549,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,699 )
How can I increase my downloads?