David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This paper asks whether statutory social insurance programs, which provide contributory tax-based income support to people with disabilities, are compatible with the disability rights movement's ideas. Central to the movement that led to the Americans with Disabilities Act is the insight that physical or mental conditions do not disable; barriers created by the environment or by social attitudes keep persons with physical or mental differences from participating in society as equals.The conflict between the civil rights approach and insurance seems apparent. A person takes out insurance to deal with tragedy, such as premature death, or damage, such as accidental harm to an automobile or home. Social insurance, for example, the United States Social Security old-age and disability programs, consists of government-run insurance to cover risks of advanced age and disability for which the private market has not provided affordable coverage. But the civil rights approach to disability posits that disability is not a risk, not tragedy, and not a damage or defect. Instead it is a maladaptation of society to human variation. This paper argues that a justification remains for social insurance under the civil rights approach to disability, and further suggests that expansion of social insurance for disability is both compatible with disability rights principles and supported by wise public policy.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andrew C. Byrnes, The Disability Discrimination Ordinance, the Un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and Beyond: Achievements and Challenges After ten Years of Hong Kong Anti-Discrimination Legislation.
Mark Greene & Steven Augello (2011). Everworse: What's Wrong with Selecting for Disability? Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (2):131-140.
Phillip French & Rosemary Kayess, Deadly Currents Beneath Calm Waters: Persons with Disability and the Right to Life in Australia.
Dan W. Brock, Health Care Resource Prioritization and Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities.
Helen Meekosha (2002). Virtual Activists? Women and the Making of Identities of Disability. Hypatia 17 (3):67-88.
Annamaria Olivieri & Ermanno Pitacco, Stochastic Models for Disability: Approximations and Applications to Sickness and Personal Accident Insurance.
Frederic Megret, The Disabilities Convention: Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities or Disability Rights?
Elizabeth Barnes (2009). Disability, Minority, and Difference. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):337-355.
Ron Amundson & Shari Tresky (2008). Bioethics and Disability Rights: Conflicting Values and Perspectives. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (2/3):111-123.
Ron Amundson & Shari Tresky (2007). On a Bioethical Challenge to Disability Rights. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (6):541 – 561.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #71,683 of 1,088,784 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,784 )
How can I increase my downloads?