Experimentation versus Theory Choice: A Social-epistemological Account

Abstract This paper examines how experimental scientists choose theoretical frameworks as well as their experimental systems for doing research. I start out with Kuhn's claim that there are no (single) algorithms that could determine the choices made by individual scientists. Samir Okasha has recently provided an argument for this claim in terms of social choice theory, which I briefly discuss. Then, I show why this problem is not relevant in an experimental science. There are social mechanisms in place that make sure the community chooses the best framework and a matching experimental system. As historical evidence for this claim, I present the case of classical genetics.
Keywords Philosophy of science  Experimentation  Theory Choice  Social epistemology  Genetics
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links This entry has no external links. Add one.
Through your library Only published papers are available at libraries

Similar books and articles
Colin Bird (2000). The Possibility of Self-Government. American Political Science Review 94 (3):563-577.
Siu L. Chow (1987). Science, Ecological Validity and Experimentation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 17 (2):181–194.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2008). Reducible and Nonsensical Uses of Game Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (2):247-266.

Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-02-26

Total downloads

62 ( #15,111 of 549,044 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

14 ( #4,536 of 549,044 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums