David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Sebastian Luft & Søren Overgaard (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology. Routledge (2011)
Human freedom was Jean-Paul Sartre’s central philosophical preoccupation throughout his career. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that the cornerstone of his moral and political thought, Being and Nothingness, contains an extensive and subtle account of the metaphysical freedom that he considered fundamental to the kind of existence that humans have. Although rooted in phenomenology, Sartre’s account of freedom draws very little on analysis of the experience of freedom itself. It is rather based on a general phenomenological account of perceptual experience and the motivation of action. The result is one of the most sophisticated portrayals of freedom in Western philosophical literature. It is certainly the most detailed account of freedom given by any of those philosophers who made the description of experience their central philosophical method. This claim is more usually made for Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s account of freedom, which he presents in critical dialogue with Sartre’s, but as we will see his account stops short of a full phenomenology of agency and owes its plausibility and popularity in part to its author having asked one question too few.
|Keywords||Freedom Phenomenology Sartre Merleau-Ponty|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mary T. Clark (ed.) (1973). The Problem of Freedom. New York,Appleton-Century-Crofts.
William Wilkerson (2010). Time and Ambiguity: Reassessing Merleau-Ponty on Sartrean Freedom. Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (2):pp. 207-234.
John M. Moreland (1973). For-Itself and in-Itself in Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. Philosophy Today 17 (4):311-318.
Trevor Perri (2013). Image and Ontology in Merleau-Ponty. Continental Philosophy Review 46 (1):75-97.
Pratima Bowes (1971). Consciousness And Freedom: Three Views. London,: Methuen.
James Schmidt (1979). Lordship and Bondage in Merleau-Ponty and Sartre. Political Theory 7 (2):201-227.
William S. Wilkerson (2009). In the World but Not Of the World. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):113-129.
Chad Kleist (2013). Using Sartre's Critique of Dialectical Reason for Managerial Decision-Making. Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):341-352.
Matthew C. Eshleman (2008). The Misplaced Chapter on Bad Faith, or Reading Being and Nothingness in Reverse. Sartre Studies International 14 (2):1-22.
Neil Roberts (2004). Fanon, Sartre, Violence, and Freedom. Sartre Studies International 10 (2):139-160.
Jean-Luc Nancy (1993). The Experience of Freedom. Stanford University Press.
Jack Reynolds (2014). Existentialism, Philosophy Of. In Michael T. Gibbons (ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Wiley-Blackwell 1194–1199.
Peter Poellner (2015). Early Sartre on Freedom and Ethics. European Journal of Philosophy 23 (2):221-247.
Christopher E. Macann (1993). Four Phenomenological Philosophers: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty. Routledge.
Mary Warnock (1970). Existentialism. New York,Oxford U.P..
Added to index2011-02-08
Total downloads51 ( #82,479 of 1,796,529 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #281,430 of 1,796,529 )
How can I increase my downloads?