Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):499-519 (2009)
|Abstract||Moral philosophy has long been preoccupied by a supposed dichotomy between the “good” and the “right”. This dichotomy has been taken to define certain allegedly central issues for ethics. How are the good and the right related to each other? For example, is one of the two (as many philosophers have put it) “prior” to the other? If so, is the good prior to the right, or is the right prior to the good?|
|Keywords||Ought metaethics semantics|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark Schroeder (2012). Philosophy of Language for Metaethics. In Gillian Russell & Delia Graff Fara (eds.), The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Routledge.
Wes Morriston (2000). What is so Good About Moral Freedom? Philosophical Quarterly 50 (200):344-358.
John W. Powell (2010). What's a Good Argument? The Philosopher's Magazine (51):87-92.
Aysel Doğan (2011). On the Priority of the Right to the Good. Kant-Studien 102 (3):316-334.
Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (1992). The Good Life and the Human Good. Cambridge University Press.
Sergio Tenenbaum (ed.) (2010). Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good. Oxford University Press.
Rachel Barney (2008). The Carpenter and the Good. In D. Cairns, F. G. Herrmann & T. Penner (eds.), Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic. University of Edinburgh.
Ralph Wedgwood (2009). The "Good" and the "Right" Revisited. Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):499-519..
Added to index2009-12-08
Total downloads59 ( #16,405 of 549,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?