David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 17 (2):127 – 139 (2007)
The Confucian tradition is often held to have accorded the family a prominent place in their ethics. This paper distinguishes three different senses in which the family is held to be primary in Confucian morality. It then explores Hsun Tzu's views on the family and familial relations. I argue that, while other early Confucians such as Confucius and Mencius would have held the family to be primary in all three senses, Hsun Tzu held the family to be primary in only one of the three senses. In particular, there is textual evidence that Hsun Tzu holds that one's primary obligation is to the ruler of the state, rather than to the immediate family.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. C. Lau (ed.) (2000). Confucius: The Analects. Columbia University Press.
Rui Zhu (2002). What If the Father Commits a Crime? Journal of the History of Ideas 63 (1):1-17.
John Schrecker (1997). Filial Piety as a Basis for Human Rights in Confucius and Mencius. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 24 (3):401-412.
A. S. Cua (1978). The Quasi-Empirical Aspect of Hsün-Tzu's Philosophy of Human Nature. Philosophy East and West 28 (1):3-19.
Citations of this work BETA
Kim Sungmoon (2011). From Desire to Civility: Is Xunzi a Hobbesian? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (3):291-309.
Similar books and articles
A. S. Cua (1985). Ethical Uses of the Past in Early Confucianism: The Case of Hsün Tzu. Philosophy East and West 35 (2):133-156.
Kwong-loi Shun (1997). Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford University Press.
Cyril Welch (1968). Reflections on Things at Hand. An Ancient Anthology of Neo-Confucian Thought Translated and Annotated by Wing-Tsit Chan. New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1967. Pp. Xli, 441. $12.50. [REVIEW] Dialogue 7 (02):297-302.
Dallas M. High & Howard B. Turner (1987). Surrogate Decision-Making: The Elderly's Familial Expectations. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Chloë Taylor (2012). Foucault and Familial Power. Hypatia 27 (1):201-218.
Zailin Zhang (2009). Theories of Family in Ancient Chinese Philosophy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):343-359.
Robert E. Allinson (1998). The Debate Between Mencius and Hsün-Tzu: Contemporary Applications. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 25 (1):31-49.
Michael R. Martin (1995). Ritual Action (Li) in Confucius and Hsun Tzu. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (1):13 – 30.
Laurence D. Houlgate (1988). Family and State: The Philosophy of Family Law. Rowman & Littlefield.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #189,873 of 1,725,471 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,436 of 1,725,471 )
How can I increase my downloads?