Pragma-dialectical Theory and Interpersonal Interaction Outcomes: Unproductive Interpersonal Behavior as Violations of Rules for Critical Discussion
Argumentation 15 (3):313-330 (2001)
| Abstract | The purpose of this research review is to examine the usefulness of reconstructing problematic interpersonal conflict behavior as violations of rules for critical discussions. Dialectical reconstruction of interpersonal conflict behavior sheds light on the ways in which dialectical fallacies influence not only the course of a critical discussion, but also the personal and relationship outcomes experienced by arguers. Conflict sequences such as cross complaining and demand/withdraw are shown to be problematic, in part, because they prevent parties from resolving their difference through rational dialogue. The paper concludes by presenting some implications of the pragma-dialectical reconstruction of interpersonal conflict behavior | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser (2003). The Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Argumentation. Argumentation 17 (4):387-403.
Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst (2003). A Pragma-Dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion. Argumentation 17 (4):365-386.
Frans H. Eemeren (2012). The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion. Argumentation 26 (4):439-457.
Erik C. W. Krabbe (2013). Topical Roots of Formal Dialectic. Argumentation 27 (1):71-87.
Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels (2012). Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research. Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.
Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels (2012). Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research. Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.
Eveline T. Feteris (2000). A Dialogical Theory of Legal Discussions:Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Legalargumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3).
Paul Weirich (1984). Interpersonal Utility in Principles of Social Choice. Erkenntnis 21 (3):295 - 317.
M. Afzalur Rahim, Jan Edward Garrett & Gabriel F. Buntzman (1992). Ethics of Managing Interpersonal Conflict in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):423-432.
D. Mefford (1982). A Comparison of Dialectical and Boolean Algebraic Models of the Genesis of Interpersonal Relations. In Hayward R. Alker (ed.), Dialectical Logics for the Political Sciences. Rodopi.
David Braybrooke (2003). Toward an Alliance Between the Issue-Processing Approach and Pragma-Dialectical Analysis. Argumentation 17 (4):513-535.
Jean H. M. Wagemans (2011). The Assessment of Argumentation From Expert Opinion. Argumentation 25 (3):329-339.
Alvin I. Goldman (1997). Argumentation and Interpersonal Justification. Argumentation 11 (2):155-164.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-09-11Total downloads1 ( #274,507 of 548,974 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,974 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
