Frege's permutation argument revisited
Synthese 147 (1):43 - 61 (2005)
| Abstract | any other one with the False, without contradicting any stipulations previously introduced (we shall call this claim the identiability thesis, following Schroeder-Heister [13]). As far as we are aware, there is no consensus in the literature as to (i) the proper interpretation of the permutation argument and the identiability thesis, (ii) the validity of the permutation argument, and (iii) the truth of the identiability thesis.1 In this paper, we undertake a detailed technical study of the two main lines of interpretation, and gather some evidence for favoring one interpretation over the other. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
G. Aldo Antonelli & Robert C. May (2000). Frege's New Science. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (3):242-270.
J. Robert G. Williams (2008). Permutations and Foster Problems: Two Puzzles or One? Ratio 21 (1):91–105.
Robert May (2006). Frege on Indexicals. Philosophical Review 115 (4):487-516.
Henry Jackman (1996). Radical Interpretation and the Permutation Principle. Erkenntnis 44 (3):317-326.
A. W. Moore & Andrew Rein (1987). Frege's Permutation Argument. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (1):51-54.
Richard Gaskin (2011). Reference and the Permutation Argument. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (2pt2):295-309.
Peter Schroeder-Heister (1987). A Model-Theoretic Reconstruction of Frege's Permutation Argument. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (1):69-79.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #99,573 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,113 )How can I increase my downloads? |

