Graduate studies at Western
Erkenntnis 71 (3):355 - 359 (2009)
|Abstract||The Cable Guy will definitely come between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., and I can bet on one of two possibilities: that he will arrive between 8 and 12, or between 12 and 4. Since I have no more information, it seems (eminently) plausible to suppose the two bets are equally attractive. Yet Hajek has presented a tantalising argument that purports to show that the later interval is, initial appearances to the contrary, more choice worthy. In this paper, I rebut the argument.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roger Clarke (2010). “The Ravens Paradox” is a Misnomer. Synthese 175 (3):427-440.
Darrell P. Rowbottom & Peter Baumann (2009). To Thine Own Self Be Untrue: A Diagnosis of the Cable Guy Paradox. Logique et Analyse 51 (204):355-364.
Alan Hajek (2005). The Cable Guy Paradox. Analysis 65 (286):112-119.
Brian Kierland, Bradley Monton & Samuel Ruhmkorff (2008). Avoiding Certain Frustration, Reflection, and the Cable Guy Paradox. Philosophical Studies 138 (3):317 - 333.
Ken Levy (2009). The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox. Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.
Mark D. Harmon (1991). Hate Groups and Cable Public Access. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 6 (3):146 – 155.
Erik J. Wielenberg (2001). The New Paradox of the Stone Revisited. Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):261-268.
Alan Hájek (2005). The Cable Guy Paradox. Analysis 65 (286):112–119.
Added to index2009-08-22
Total downloads40 ( #33,819 of 738,476 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?